COL1
4th
TB0
Preview Matchup
Morton vs. Gausman
BAL
11:07 PM
TOR
Preview Matchup
Keller vs. Gillispie
PIT
11:10 PM
MIA
Preview Matchup
Houck vs. Leiter
BOS
12:05 AM
TEX
Preview Matchup
Megill vs. Brown
NYM
12:10 AM
HOU
Preview Matchup
Taillon vs. Kelly
CHC
1:40 AM
AZ
Preview Matchup
Springs vs. Castillo
ATH
1:40 AM
SEA
Preview Matchup
López vs. Cease
ATL
1:40 AM
SD
Preview Matchup
Flaherty vs. Yamamoto
DET
2:10 AM
LAD
<
>

Catcher framing is the art of a catcher receiving a pitch in a way that makes it more likely for an umpire to call it a strike. This page breaks down the catcher’s view into eight zones around the strike zone and shows the called strike percentage of all non-swings in that zone. Strike Rate shows the cumulative total of all zones. Catcher Framing Runs converts strikes to runs saved on a .125 run/strike basis, and includes park and pitcher adjustments. To qualify, a catcher must receive 6 called pitches per team game.
How to say it: “In 2018, Jeff Mathis converted 55 percent of non-swing pitches into called strikes in the Shadow Zone, the best rate of any catcher in baseball.”
Qualifier: For catchers 6 called pitches (i.e., takes, or non-swings) in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. For pitchers and batters 1.5 called pitches in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. (The shadow zone is essentially the edges of the strike zone, roughly one ball width inside and one ball wide outside of the zone. See what that looks like here.)
For pitchers/batters: This shows the framing that occurred behind the plate while the player in question was pitching or hitting.
View: Batter
▾
Team
▾
2024
▾
Min Pitches Called: 100
▾


Rk. Batter Team Pitches
Catcher
Framing
Runs
Strike
Rate
 Zone 11
 Zone 12
 Zone 13
 Zone 14
 Zone 16
 Zone 17
 Zone 18
 Zone 19
1 Frelick, Sal mil 465 5 53.8% 40% 91% 66.7% 66.4% 62.1% 16.7% 38.9% 12.5%
2 Paredes, Isaac chc 583 5 52.7% 23.1% 61.5% 40% 45.1% 79.5% 22.7% 47.4% 21.9%
3 Betts, Mookie la 565 5 52.6% 17.6% 62.9% 48% 60.3% 66.3% 14.3% 50% 12.8%
4 Arozarena, Randy sea 648 5 51.9% 21.2% 43% 33.3% 59.8% 75.3% 27.3% 55.9% 31.9%
5 Caballero, José tb 331 5 58.6% 27.8% 86% 50% 66.7% 82.7% 21.4% 50% 9.5%
6 Perkins, Blake mil 408 4 54.4% 27% 55.7% 20% 67.1% 73.5% 37.5% 60.2% 38.5%
7 Schneider, Davis tor 412 4 55.3% 28.6% 66.7% 65.8% 58.6% 73.4% 33.3% 50% 22.2%
8 Arraez, Luis sd 512 4 52.5% 33.8% 74% 37.5% 68% 66.7% 37.8% 39.8% 10.5%
9 Rutschman, Adley bal 558 4 52% 19.5% 46.8% 10.3% 70.1% 71.1% 38.3% 58.3% 17.2%
10 Clement, Ernie tor 235 4 60.4% 14.3% 61.9% 50% 73.7% 78.3% 40% 58.5% 32.4%
11 Schanuel, Nolan ana 525 4 52.4% 28.6% 50% 11.1% 69.7% 54.8% 44.3% 55.5% 11.4%
12 Kiner-Falefa, Isiah pit 355 4 53.5% 20% 56.5% 33.3% 54.5% 75.5% 0% 49.2% 39.5%
13 Hernández, Enrique la 362 4 54.1% 6.7% 54.3% 17.6% 60% 68.7% 41.7% 59.3% 34.1%
14 Flores, Wilmer sf 202 3 57.9% 11.1% 89.7% 46.7% 57.9% 78.3% 22.2% 48.1% 39.1%
15 Kwan, Steven cle 602 3 50% 43.5% 62% 6.3% 71.6% 35.5% 22.5% 37.8% 9.1%
16 Higashioka, Kyle sd 209 3 56.5% 20% 52.6% 55.6% 47.8% 81.3% 11.1% 51.8% 37.5%
17 Chourio, Jackson mil 411 3 50.9% 27.8% 45% 23.1% 75% 71.8% 21.1% 52.8% 27.1%
18 De La Cruz, Bryan pit 389 3 52.7% 8.3% 16.7% 5.9% 48.4% 79.7% 20% 67.8% 33.3%
19 Ruiz, Keibert was 313 3 53% 40% 73.5% 28.6% 62.4% 71.2% 33.3% 40.3% 15.4%
20 Peña, Jeremy hou 389 3 52.2% 21.1% 18.5% 7.7% 48.1% 68.8% 53.5% 67.3% 40%
21 Keith, Colt det 419 3 53% 25.7% 64.9% 12.5% 63.4% 72.5% 44.2% 60.6% 21.6%
22 Hoerner, Nico chc 459 3 50.5% 14.3% 64.3% 40.9% 59.4% 73.5% 27.3% 44.4% 14%
23 Duvall, Adam atl 243 3 53.5% 25% 50% 16.7% 57.1% 73.7% 33.3% 58.7% 36%
24 Kirk, Alejandro tor 306 3 53.6% 33.3% 67.7% 34.6% 74.2% 61.8% 37.5% 53.3% 24.3%
25 Siri, Jose tb 311 3 53.7% 30.8% 52.6% 9.5% 67.3% 71.8% 20% 65.5% 36.4%
26 Burger, Jake mia 358 3 53.1% 20% 80% 22.2% 80% 75.8% 40% 42.3% 16.3%
27 Cowser, Colton bal 513 3 51.3% 17.6% 60.6% 25% 63% 65.4% 39.3% 55.5% 22.9%
28 Sánchez, Gary mil 299 3 54.8% 20% 64.1% 21.1% 70% 76.1% 16.7% 57.9% 32.6%
29 Garcia, Maikel kc 534 3 50.2% 20% 20.4% 16% 51.9% 66.5% 36% 68.6% 36%
30 Bogaerts, Xander sd 428 3 52.3% 7.1% 26.5% 0% 64.1% 71% 35.5% 60.7% 38.2%
31 Pham, Tommy kc 469 3 51.6% 14.3% 31.5% 28.6% 50.9% 62.2% 25% 70% 44.4%
32 Tovar, Ezequiel col 290 3 53.4% 38.9% 60.7% 52.2% 61.3% 81.6% 13.3% 29.5% 22.2%
33 Ward, Taylor ana 600 3 49.7% 21.4% 56.6% 34% 65% 69.1% 28.6% 42.1% 21.1%
34 Bryant, Kris col 116 2 54.3% 28.6% 66.7% 20% 72.7% 83.3% 40% 51.4% 25%
35 Mateo, Jorge bal 147 2 53.7% 0% 50% 23.1% 72.7% 68.9% 25% 65.6% 26.3%
36 Margot, Manuel min 264 2 53.4% 22.2% 26.3% 30% 70.3% 73.2% 35.7% 72.7% 25.8%
37 Merrifield, Whit atl 276 2 52.9% 14.3% 51.2% 30.8% 60% 67.5% 16.7% 66.7% 18.4%
38 Solano, Donovan sd 255 2 52.2% 14.3% 66.7% 29.2% 43.5% 85.5% 12.5% 42.2% 21.9%
39 Chapman, Matt sf 589 2 48.9% 15.9% 45.5% 19% 52.7% 65.4% 39.1% 62.4% 25.9%
40 Iglesias, Jose nym 228 2 53.5% 41.7% 82.8% 57.1% 61.1% 71.1% 37.5% 41.2% 11.5%
41 Yepez, Juan was 171 2 52% 12.5% 70.6% 12.5% 51.7% 83.8% 54.5% 54.3% 15.4%
42 Estrada, Thairo sf 220 2 55% 0% 56.5% 31.6% 57.1% 84% 55% 47.5% 40%
43 Frazier, Adam kc 246 2 52% 33.3% 78% 28.6% 65% 68.3% 23.1% 47.6% 18.2%
44 Hamilton, David bos 241 2 53.1% 25% 69.2% 0% 73.8% 73.3% 28.6% 40.6% 21.1%
45 Carroll, Corbin ari 574 2 49% 24% 68.3% 41.1% 57.4% 64.4% 28.2% 33.9% 22.5%
46 Bregman, Alex hou 527 2 49.3% 22.2% 53.7% 45.7% 60.4% 64.5% 27.8% 50% 23.4%
47 Kelly, Carson tex 246 2 53.3% 41.7% 77.3% 47.6% 65.5% 68% 12.5% 49.2% 34.1%
48 Stefanic, Michael ana 120 2 58.3% 14.3% 35.3% 42.9% 80% 83.3% 66.7% 55.6% 38.9%
49 Aranda, Jonathan tb 124 2 58.1% 46.2% 90% 33.3% 60.6% 55.6% 42.9% 53.3% 44.4%
50 Báez, Javier det 137 2 59.1% 0% 31.6% 12.5% 61.9% 73.7% 75% 75.9% 50%
51 Suzuki, Seiya chc 599 2 48.9% 38.9% 75.6% 60.9% 52.1% 67.1% 10.5% 26.1% 13.8%
52 Velázquez, Nelson kc 172 2 54.7% 0% 33.3% 23.1% 75% 69% 50% 69.2% 44.4%
53 Noel, Jhonkensy cle 133 2 59.4% 50% 35.3% 28.6% 76.7% 77.8% 54.5% 65.2% 28.6%
54 Mountcastle, Ryan bal 302 2 51.3% 0% 24.1% 4.8% 60% 74.7% 27.3% 77.8% 28.6%
55 Vaughn, Andrew cws 437 2 49.4% 23.1% 58.4% 20.8% 63.3% 67.6% 35.7% 50% 19.4%
56 Kim, Ha-Seong sd 550 2 48.4% 21.7% 45.9% 24.2% 56.3% 71.9% 13.3% 45.3% 19.2%
57 Altuve, Jose hou 420 2 48.3% 31.6% 81.7% 46.4% 56.4% 62.4% 28.6% 24.3% 10.2%
58 Nootbaar, Lars stl 437 2 50.6% 32% 57.6% 27.3% 70.4% 63.8% 23.8% 45.5% 15.6%
59 Semien, Marcus tex 500 2 50.2% 4.5% 53.6% 39.5% 46.3% 73.8% 23.5% 51.5% 31.4%
60 Garver, Mitch sea 462 2 50.2% 16.7% 38.5% 34.8% 49% 67.6% 28% 55.1% 36.4%
61 Crawford, J.P. sea 492 2 49.4% 26.1% 60.2% 38.9% 67.7% 52.5% 21.1% 42.6% 8.7%
62 Taylor, Tyrone nym 267 2 53.6% 7.7% 65.5% 22.2% 63.4% 75% 38.9% 63.1% 25.7%
63 Vierling, Matt det 542 2 49.4% 21.7% 43.4% 12.9% 47.8% 73.3% 42.9% 53.8% 25.3%
64 Volpe, Anthony nyy 651 2 49.6% 18.8% 51.9% 26% 68.6% 67.3% 16.1% 52.5% 18.3%
65 Gurriel Jr., Lourdes ari 367 2 48.8% 0% 25.5% 29.2% 41.2% 77.4% 30.8% 59.7% 37.1%
66 Fermin, Freddy kc 225 2 52% 36.4% 67.5% 33.3% 54.5% 66.2% 22.2% 44.1% 31%
67 Canha, Mark sf 464 2 48.9% 0% 51.5% 34.2% 51.7% 86.7% 27.8% 41.2% 19.4%
68 Vogelbach, Daniel tor 107 2 62.6% 28.6% 85.7% 50% 61.9% 85.7% 25% 59.3% 33.3%
69 Marte, Noelvi cin 137 2 56.9% 0% 46.7% 0% 30% 84.4% 37.5% 63% 47.6%
70 Doyle, Brenton col 370 2 50.8% 0% 60% 18.2% 58.1% 74.3% 35.3% 42.3% 35.6%
71 Steer, Spencer cin 556 2 48.9% 21.4% 52.8% 14.7% 51.5% 73% 22.7% 57.9% 13.6%
72 Jeffers, Ryan min 345 2 51% 25.8% 56.4% 42.9% 61.7% 70.4% 50% 47.3% 24.4%
73 Rojas, Johan phi 273 2 53.8% 33.3% 42.3% 20% 69% 80.7% 23.5% 56.5% 31.6%
74 Arenado, Nolan stl 493 2 50.1% 25% 52.1% 25.8% 57.4% 68.3% 29.2% 58.6% 27.5%
75 Vázquez, Christian min 195 2 55.4% 18.8% 63% 33.3% 68.2% 80% 42.9% 56.8% 20.8%
76 Correa, Carlos min 274 2 54% 0% 25% 14.3% 81.5% 76.2% 43.5% 59.1% 27%
77 Perdomo, Geraldo ari 428 2 50% 8.1% 29% 36.4% 75.7% 57.6% 46.2% 62.2% 38.6%
78 Lopez, Otto mia 274 2 52.9% 27.3% 78.6% 50% 60% 65.8% 6.3% 56.1% 29.5%
79 Valdez, Enmanuel bos 189 2 54% 38.9% 83.9% 33.3% 50% 51.6% 29.4% 59.4% 57.1%
80 Bader, Harrison nym 345 2 50.1% 44.4% 74.4% 74.1% 63% 67.1% 12.5% 34.6% 14.3%
81 Thomas, Lane cle 517 2 48.9% 44.4% 73.9% 44.4% 46.3% 70.4% 15.4% 31% 13.7%
82 Hayes, Ke'Bryan pit 291 1 50.5% 20% 63.3% 42.1% 70.3% 77.5% 25% 39.7% 5.4%
83 Jung, Josh tex 110 1 52.7% 0% 37.5% 0% 63.6% 67.9% 50% 73.7% 47.8%
84 Fitzgerald, Tyler sf 268 1 49.6% 9.1% 55.6% 11.8% 71.9% 68.2% 26.3% 58.6% 27.7%
85 Rivera, Emmanuel bal 220 1 49.1% 9.1% 34.4% 8.3% 53.8% 68.3% 53.8% 60.5% 32%
86 Massey, Michael kc 279 1 49.8% 18.9% 55.6% 14.3% 63.4% 65.5% 30% 56.9% 43.8%
87 Refsnyder, Rob bos 257 1 48.6% 8.3% 50% 19% 73.5% 73.6% 21.1% 48.2% 26.9%
88 Pederson, Joc ari 396 1 47.5% 12.5% 41.9% 0% 56% 50.9% 39.2% 65.7% 22.7%
89 Myers, Dane mia 100 1 51% 0% 28.6% 0% 76.9% 81% 30% 53.1% 40%
90 Outman, James la 139 1 49.6% 15.4% 54.5% 37.5% 67.7% 61.9% 28.6% 62.5% 12.5%
91 McCarthy, Jake ari 340 1 47.9% 22.2% 48.1% 16.7% 58.4% 70.9% 25% 51.3% 17.4%
92 Dubón, Mauricio hou 213 1 48.8% 11.1% 53.8% 7.1% 43.5% 77% 22.2% 52.3% 22.2%
93 García Jr., Luis was 323 1 49.2% 20.8% 52.9% 0% 58.9% 73.1% 28.2% 61.8% 20.6%
94 Joe, Connor pit 362 1 47% 33.3% 64% 43.3% 58.1% 70.4% 13.3% 28.6% 13.5%
95 Rogers, Jake det 289 1 47.8% 12.5% 52.6% 20.8% 48.6% 78.4% 18.8% 47.4% 30.4%
96 Grissom, Vaughn bos 104 1 51.9% 22.2% 63.6% 0% 68.4% 76.2% 0% 57.1% 26.7%
97 Wood, James was 355 1 48.7% 0% 22.2% 0% 60.6% 79.4% 34.8% 60% 19%
98 Ahmed, Nick sd 147 1 50.3% 0% 21.4% 12.5% 60% 63.3% 40% 64% 40%
99 Fletcher, Dominic cws 195 1 50.8% 33.3% 68% 30% 63% 76% 24% 41.4% 22.2%
100 Nevin, Tyler oak 233 1 48.9% 7.1% 38.5% 14.3% 32.3% 71.9% 41.7% 63.5% 29.6%
101 Martini, Nick cin 119 1 50.4% 27.3% 45% 14.3% 66.7% 66.7% 75% 60% 26.7%
102 Julien, Edouard min 298 1 48.7% 30.4% 57.1% 33.3% 59.7% 43.8% 41.7% 54.9% 25%
103 Cruz, Oneil pit 490 1 48% 0% 26.2% 0% 57.9% 62.5% 39.1% 61.7% 28.6%
104 Winn, Masyn stl 538 1 46.8% 9.5% 39.7% 28.1% 52.9% 67.5% 36.8% 50.5% 21.6%
105 Westburg, Jordan bal 293 1 50.9% 8.3% 41.2% 14.3% 69.2% 69.7% 52.6% 49.2% 30.6%
106 Newman, Kevin ari 215 1 50.7% 62.5% 68% 30.4% 66.7% 73% 20% 37.5% 13.3%
107 O'Hoppe, Logan ana 322 1 49.7% 40% 59.5% 30.4% 72.7% 69.9% 25% 45.3% 17%
108 Springer, George tor 476 1 47.5% 4% 26.2% 0% 60.5% 61.8% 45.5% 60% 47.4%
109 Monasterio, Andruw mil 145 1 49.7% 40% 50% 36.4% 60.9% 75.9% 20% 44.4% 25%
110 Senzel, Nick cws 220 1 50.5% 22.2% 69.2% 14.3% 43.8% 78.1% 0% 40% 28%
111 Hernaiz, Darell oak 101 1 58.4% 0% 30.8% 33.3% 66.7% 86.4% 62.5% 59.3% 50%
112 Meyers, Jake hou 349 1 48.1% 12.5% 72.9% 31.6% 59.4% 69.7% 15.4% 37.8% 14%
113 Pillar, Kevin ana 211 1 49.8% 8.3% 66.7% 18.8% 50% 72.2% 25% 51.4% 28%
114 Rojas, Miguel la 253 1 49% 30% 65.5% 33.3% 55.2% 70% 18.8% 43.6% 30.6%
115 Bouchard, Sean col 103 1 53.4% 0% 35.7% 36.4% 45.5% 74.3% 50% 71.4% 33.3%
116 Marte, Starling nym 299 1 47.8% 8.7% 18.4% 5.9% 56.3% 83.6% 33.3% 58.2% 36.7%
117 Martínez, Angel cle 146 1 50.7% 26.7% 71.4% 12.5% 72.1% 55% 16.7% 38.5% 14.3%
118 Arcia, Orlando atl 434 1 47.5% 5% 50.9% 15.8% 52.9% 68% 27.6% 56.1% 18%
119 Malloy, Justyn-Henry det 223 1 50.7% 0% 41.9% 18.8% 68.2% 72.9% 35.7% 68.2% 21.9%
120 Rosario, Amed cin 189 1 51.3% 36.4% 58.1% 36.4% 58.3% 74.5% 25% 40.7% 30%
121 Friedl, TJ cin 272 1 49.3% 36.4% 76.9% 36.4% 65.4% 61.5% 27.8% 34.8% 14.3%
122 Sosa, Lenyn cws 242 1 51.2% 8.3% 76.3% 35.3% 55.6% 67.4% 28.6% 51.1% 24.2%
123 Jankowski, Travis tex 190 1 48.4% 12.5% 40% 0% 55.6% 48.1% 30% 58.6% 41.7%
124 Stott, Bryson phi 528 1 47.7% 22.4% 62.5% 46.2% 55.1% 74.4% 25.5% 46.9% 19.2%
125 Herrera, Jose ari 108 1 51.9% 25% 72% 33.3% 57.7% 71.4% 14.3% 50% 0%
126 Rosario, Eddie atl 201 1 47.8% 13.3% 64.7% 0% 55% 52.6% 55.6% 51.1% 15.4%
127 Miranda, Jose min 241 1 46.9% 56.5% 74.4% 46.7% 69% 70.5% 0% 20.4% 8%
128 Jansen, Danny bos 316 1 49.1% 14.3% 45.5% 24% 66.7% 76.5% 21.4% 48.9% 27%
129 McCutchen, Andrew pit 549 1 48.1% 15.6% 41.7% 28.6% 54.1% 69.8% 31% 51.6% 37.8%
130 Encarnacion, Jerar sf 103 1 53.4% 0% 57.1% 0% 56.3% 78.1% 33.3% 69.2% 33.3%
131 Ortiz, Joey mil 561 1 47.1% 21.7% 55.1% 22.2% 59.7% 65.4% 23.8% 39% 12.7%
132 Walker, Jordan stl 113 1 54% 0% 66.7% 10% 87.5% 77.8% 0% 61.1% 34.8%
133 Trevino, Jose nyy 220 1 50.5% 27.3% 75.9% 40% 57.6% 66.1% 9.1% 45% 15%
134 Rodgers, Brendan col 434 1 47% 11.8% 37.2% 13.3% 63.3% 74.8% 18.2% 49% 28.6%
135 Alonso, Pete nym 673 1 47.8% 20% 52.8% 30% 54.3% 69.8% 37.5% 52% 18.2%
136 Freeman, Tyler cle 330 1 50% 33.3% 70.5% 40% 61.9% 71.2% 35% 38.9% 17.5%
137 Jiménez, Leo tor 164 1 50% 12.5% 61.5% 40% 56% 62.5% 14.3% 48% 30%
138 Sheets, Gavin cws 443 1 49% 37.9% 69.4% 14.3% 59.7% 59% 36.5% 47.7% 11.8%
139 Stubbs, Garrett phi 127 1 51.2% 35.7% 85.7% 25% 66.7% 56% 20% 29.4% 0%
140 Jones, Nolan col 343 1 48.1% 14.3% 25% 0% 68.1% 51.1% 43.9% 62.7% 21.4%
141 Ramírez, Harold was 121 1 55.4% 62.5% 66.7% 80% 84.2% 66.7% 20% 42.1% 15%
142 Kavadas, Niko ana 108 1 55.6% 72.7% 52.9% 33.3% 75% 44.4% 16.7% 50% 25%
143 Vargas, Ildemaro was 233 1 51.1% 37.5% 66.7% 26.7% 63.6% 48.6% 38.9% 56.4% 20%
144 Jiménez, Eloy bal 200 1 50.5% 9.1% 33.3% 28.6% 56% 75% 38.5% 49.2% 48.4%
145 Slater, Austin bal 186 1 48.4% 22.2% 36.4% 20.8% 47.4% 68.9% 0% 66.7% 26.7%
146 Ramos, Heliot sf 341 1 47.5% 26.3% 56.4% 41.4% 67.7% 69% 17.6% 39% 14.9%
147 Barger, Addison tor 164 1 48.8% 14.3% 33.3% 0% 71.4% 81.8% 42.1% 59% 12.5%
148 Andujar, Miguel oak 211 1 48.3% 28.6% 55.6% 12.5% 63% 68.5% 22.2% 47.8% 20%
149 Caminero, Junior tb 113 1 52.2% 0% 45.5% 20% 70% 82.1% 27.3% 50% 40%
150 Grossman, Robbie kc 277 1 49.1% 25.9% 68.1% 44% 59.2% 63.9% 25% 31.7% 9.1%
151 Lewis, Royce min 214 1 49.5% 38.5% 63.6% 14.3% 72.2% 71.2% 33.3% 48.6% 27%
152 Alvarez, Francisco nym 313 1 48.2% 12.5% 66.7% 27.3% 72% 67.7% 16.7% 43.4% 18.5%
153 Gonzalez, Romy bos 120 1 55% 0% 57.1% 16.7% 81% 85% 10% 51.5% 47.4%
154 Cabrera, Oswaldo nyy 256 1 49.2% 31% 66.7% 27.3% 63.5% 68.8% 33.3% 39.6% 0%
155 Urshela, Gio atl 284 1 50% 22.2% 57.1% 10.5% 71.4% 66.7% 33.3% 59.5% 25%
156 Witt Jr., Bobby kc 452 1 48% 12.5% 37.2% 15.4% 56% 74.8% 7.7% 51.9% 30.7%
157 Beck, Jordan col 131 1 54.2% 25% 36.4% 0% 80% 72.4% 50% 71.9% 34.6%
158 Pagés, Pedro stl 154 1 49.4% 12.5% 66.7% 57.9% 48% 66.7% 40% 38.5% 0%
159 Bride, Jonah mia 274 1 51.1% 36.4% 84.6% 57.1% 53.8% 77.1% 15.4% 39% 14.3%
160 Siani, Michael stl 266 1 48.9% 31.6% 46.9% 45.5% 59.7% 67.5% 21.1% 52% 5.6%
161 Renfroe, Hunter kc 365 1 49.3% 0% 38.5% 25% 71.8% 67.6% 22.2% 53.9% 26%
162 Biggio, Cavan atl 261 1 49.4% 10.5% 62.1% 14.3% 65.2% 57.1% 36% 56.6% 10%
163 Gelof, Zack oak 404 1 49.3% 10% 39% 28.6% 69.2% 75% 48.4% 45.3% 30%
164 McCormick, Chas hou 156 1 49.4% 44.4% 67.9% 25% 77.8% 65% 60% 30.4% 26.7%
165 Loperfido, Joey tor 159 1 48.4% 40% 44% 33.3% 54.5% 71.4% 33.3% 54.8% 14.3%
166 Kelenic, Jarred atl 339 1 47.8% 9.1% 14.3% 14.3% 62.4% 59.5% 51.4% 62.2% 15.4%
167 Rendon, Anthony ana 234 1 50.4% 18.8% 53.1% 35.7% 54.8% 61.1% 40% 64.5% 35.3%
168 Lee, Brooks min 109 1 54.1% 33.3% 70% 60% 64.3% 75% 40% 40% 0%
169 Lux, Gavin la 447 1 47.9% 20% 59.6% 28.6% 61.8% 65.5% 30% 51.8% 16.1%
170 Isbel, Kyle kc 337 1 49.9% 17.1% 55.6% 0% 59.2% 61.1% 29.6% 60.5% 43.8%
171 Lipscomb, Trey was 137 1 51.8% 0% 53.8% 14.3% 90.5% 77.4% 28.6% 53.8% 15.8%
172 Robert Jr., Luis cws 300 1 51% 0% 6.7% 0% 58.8% 75% 28.6% 67.4% 39.2%
173 Conforto, Michael sf 395 1 48.4% 41.9% 64.5% 39.1% 67% 53.5% 31.3% 28.6% 28.6%
174 Sánchez, Jesús mia 333 0 46.8% 13.5% 41.9% 23.1% 59.8% 46.2% 40% 67.3% 37.5%
175 Toglia, Michael col 427 0 46.4% 10% 17.6% 10% 47.3% 69.6% 34.7% 66.7% 39.5%
176 Soler, Jorge atl 466 0 47% 0% 28.2% 20% 54.2% 67.9% 35.7% 62.8% 24.3%
177 Rice, Ben nyy 157 0 43.9% 14.3% 0% 0% 47.5% 46.2% 26.1% 67.3% 25%
178 Greene, Riley det 538 0 46.3% 10.4% 25.5% 0% 58.9% 44.3% 36.7% 74.8% 29.4%
179 Urías, Ramón bal 196 0 46.9% 25% 57.7% 35.7% 70% 73.3% 30% 37.1% 12.5%
180 Rizzo, Anthony nyy 296 0 48% 8% 13.3% 20% 67.3% 42.9% 44.4% 68.4% 17.4%
181 Crews, Dylan was 106 0 45.3% 60% 63.6% 28.6% 35.7% 72.4% 0% 18.2% 6.7%
182 Torres, Gleyber nyy 638 0 47% 6.7% 72.4% 34.5% 75% 64.8% 8.7% 30.2% 11.5%
183 Vientos, Mark nym 359 0 46.5% 18.2% 45.5% 5.9% 72.3% 64.9% 25.8% 45.9% 31%
184 Goldschmidt, Paul stl 569 0 45.2% 12% 50% 31% 69.8% 63.7% 21.7% 45.1% 18.9%
185 Olivares, Edward pit 159 0 44.7% 0% 17.6% 0% 48.3% 58.3% 33.3% 57.1% 41.2%
186 Moreno, Gabriel ari 381 0 45.9% 19% 42.4% 19% 52.9% 72.3% 16.7% 43.9% 22.7%
187 Busch, Michael chc 540 0 45.6% 35.2% 74.7% 22.2% 60% 51.9% 16.3% 27.2% 16.7%
188 Langford, Wyatt tex 468 0 46.4% 19.2% 45.8% 9.7% 56.8% 70.8% 24.1% 49.5% 27.1%
189 Ibáñez, Andy det 153 0 48.4% 25% 66.7% 33.3% 59.1% 82.8% 6.7% 28% 22.2%
190 Noda, Ryan oak 129 0 47.3% 30% 21.1% 50% 87.1% 45.8% 11.1% 50% 25%
191 Pérez, Wenceel det 357 0 45.9% 40.5% 73.8% 4.8% 62.3% 64.7% 33.3% 39.5% 3.2%
192 Bichette, Bo tor 201 0 44.3% 7.1% 6.7% 0% 40.7% 68.2% 46.2% 69% 31.4%
193 De La Cruz, Elly cin 592 0 47.5% 20% 37% 7.3% 57.5% 64.4% 36.4% 63.6% 28.3%
194 Bruján, Vidal mia 192 0 44.3% 14.3% 63.6% 33.3% 48% 60.7% 40% 46.2% 14.3%
195 Ozuna, Marcell atl 543 0 46% 7.4% 28.6% 16.7% 44.1% 71.9% 40% 54.9% 21.5%
196 Smith, Josh tex 499 0 45.5% 41.1% 69.6% 12.5% 55.7% 58.6% 15.8% 35.9% 16.7%
197 Polanco, Jorge sea 420 0 45.7% 15.6% 61.9% 27.3% 53.5% 66.7% 28.9% 45.8% 22.6%
198 Casas, Triston bos 219 0 48.4% 21.4% 29.4% 0% 61.5% 50% 37.5% 60.9% 29.4%
199 Farmer, Kyle min 173 0 47.4% 0% 44.8% 0% 60.7% 69.8% 12.5% 51.5% 28.6%
200 Caratini, Victor hou 235 0 44.3% 16.7% 47.8% 18.2% 75.5% 50% 26.7% 38.5% 22.7%
201 Murphy, Sean atl 250 0 47.6% 18.8% 52.9% 0% 56.1% 65.9% 25.9% 52.3% 40%
202 Maile, Luke cin 135 0 47.4% 25% 50% 58.3% 64.7% 82.1% 0% 23.8% 30.8%
203 Cooper, Garrett bos 107 0 48.6% 0% 25% 33.3% 100% 69.2% 60% 53.8% 25%
204 Brennan, Will cle 211 0 47.4% 29.2% 42.9% 0% 67.5% 61.9% 11.1% 39.4% 0%
205 Guillorme, Luis ari 173 0 47.4% 54.5% 69% 75% 63.3% 34.4% 36.4% 50% 15.4%
206 Vargas, Miguel cws 227 0 47.1% 14.3% 40% 43.8% 43.6% 76.8% 33.3% 34.3% 32%
207 Kepler, Max min 274 0 47.4% 18.2% 52% 23.1% 57.8% 51.2% 35.5% 53.5% 42.9%
208 Fry, David cle 306 0 46.4% 19.2% 50% 24% 70.6% 63.8% 23.8% 48.1% 20.7%
209 Montero, Elehuris col 131 0 45% 37.5% 61.5% 71.4% 33.3% 65.2% 20% 46.4% 27.8%
210 Díaz, Yandy tb 581 0 46.1% 15.6% 44.6% 28.6% 64.7% 64.9% 34.1% 43.8% 31.6%
211 Stallings, Jacob col 213 0 43.7% 21.4% 60% 22.2% 69.6% 58.5% 40% 34.1% 10.7%
212 Mendick, Danny cws 106 0 45.3% 12.5% 50% 14.3% 53.8% 54.5% 50% 61.9% 23.1%
213 Toro, Abraham oak 267 0 46.8% 15.8% 78.8% 0% 50% 53.7% 38.1% 49.2% 22.2%
214 Moore, Dylan sea 450 0 45.1% 17.6% 34.6% 14.7% 61.1% 78.6% 22.9% 42.4% 27.9%
215 Schuemann, Max oak 415 0 45.8% 17.9% 41.5% 26.1% 61% 68.9% 26.3% 48.8% 20.4%
216 Taveras, Leody tex 411 0 46.7% 2.4% 20% 0% 56.3% 65.2% 42.5% 70.7% 22.9%
217 Young, Jacob was 462 0 46.1% 14.3% 56.3% 34.8% 54.8% 65.8% 26.7% 47.8% 11.5%
218 Julks, Corey cws 159 0 47.2% 45.5% 72.7% 26.7% 64.7% 63.3% 12.5% 48.3% 18.5%
219 Holliday, Jackson bal 179 0 48% 7.7% 40.9% 0% 56.5% 73.7% 38.9% 72.7% 26.7%
220 O'Neill, Tyler bos 412 0 46.6% 21.1% 52% 35.1% 59.2% 72.7% 16.7% 27.5% 30%
221 Sosa, Edmundo phi 147 0 44.9% 0% 31.3% 14.3% 45% 75% 40% 55.2% 35%
222 Harris, Brett oak 131 0 45% 33.3% 39.1% 26.7% 55.6% 70.6% 33.3% 46.2% 27.3%
223 Bleday, JJ oak 558 0 47% 34.4% 68.5% 44.4% 57.6% 53.2% 29% 43.9% 19.4%
224 Fortes, Nick mia 224 0 47.8% 16.7% 62.5% 20% 69.2% 63% 14.3% 47% 28.1%
225 Martin, Austin min 190 0 48.4% 29.4% 71.9% 43.8% 31.3% 81.3% 25% 22.5% 17.6%
226 Reynolds, Bryan pit 478 0 45.2% 32.8% 76.7% 21.4% 53.8% 72.2% 25% 38.9% 7.9%
227 Casali, Curt sf 114 0 43.9% 0% 50% 20% 60% 85.7% 14.3% 28% 12.5%
228 McKinstry, Zach det 257 0 46.7% 20% 53.7% 0% 63.3% 57.7% 50% 41.5% 11.1%
229 Goodman, Hunter col 120 0 48.3% 0% 50% 45.5% 52.9% 65.7% 0% 38.5% 20%
230 Santander, Anthony bal 515 0 46.2% 11.9% 56.8% 32.3% 62.7% 59.8% 39.4% 39.8% 20%
231 Laureano, Ramón atl 191 0 48.2% 14.3% 63.6% 20% 50% 63.3% 27.3% 43.1% 28.6%
232 Hedges, Austin cle 115 0 44.3% 40% 40% 28.6% 53.8% 75.8% 0% 26.3% 15.4%
233 Norby, Connor mia 125 0 44.8% 0% 41.7% 0% 47.1% 80% 22.2% 27.8% 28.6%
234 Meneses, Joey was 213 0 46.9% 0% 6.3% 11.1% 54.5% 60.5% 41.7% 66% 42.9%
235 Kirilloff, Alex min 128 0 44.5% 16.7% 44.4% 25% 50% 66.7% 0% 57.1% 16.7%
236 Rortvedt, Ben tb 294 0 48.3% 31.7% 85.3% 33.3% 66.1% 58.5% 7.1% 46.3% 6.3%
237 Yoshida, Masataka bos 320 0 44.7% 32% 78.8% 33.3% 64.4% 46.8% 3.6% 18.5% 0%
238 Wade, Tyler sd 127 0 44.9% 44.4% 71.4% 0% 60% 38.9% 15.4% 50% 11.1%
239 Diaz, Yainer hou 287 0 46% 50% 85.7% 31.3% 61.1% 66.7% 26.7% 29.9% 15.9%
240 Díaz, Elias sd 221 0 45.7% 30% 73.7% 36.4% 50% 55.9% 0% 42.9% 15.4%
241 Yastrzemski, Mike sf 444 0 45% 20.4% 52.6% 9.1% 65.1% 56.5% 38.5% 52.6% 5.9%
242 Robles, Victor sea 154 0 47.4% 20% 57.1% 18.2% 54.8% 80.8% 14.3% 47.1% 14.3%
243 Loftin, Nick kc 142 0 45.1% 0% 46.2% 14.3% 58.3% 51.4% 50% 70.6% 10%
244 Rafaela, Ceddanne bos 273 0 47.3% 17.6% 44.7% 15.4% 62.5% 68.1% 33.3% 57.1% 29.3%
245 Manzardo, Kyle cle 145 0 47.6% 30.8% 70% 0% 62.7% 75% 20% 22.7% 0%
246 Neto, Zach ana 421 0 47.7% 9.1% 37.9% 35% 47.6% 76.9% 33.3% 54.8% 24.2%
247 Jackson, Alex tb 100 0 49% 0% 66.7% 30% 46.2% 46.9% 50% 70% 54.5%
248 Carpenter, Matt stl 170 0 46.5% 21.4% 38.1% 0% 67.7% 48.5% 41.2% 72.4% 15%
249 Torrens, Luis nym 105 0 46.7% 20% 50% 37.5% 66.7% 59.3% 28.6% 36% 36.4%
250 Call, Alex was 101 0 49.5% 20% 27.3% 0% 64.7% 57.7% 50% 65% 41.7%
251 Canzone, Dominic sea 105 0 48.6% 60% 100% 25% 57.7% 83.3% 33.3% 27.6% 20%
252 Barnes, Austin la 135 0 45.9% 15.4% 44.4% 22.2% 60% 66.7% 0% 66.7% 13.3%
253 Anderson, Tim mia 174 0 46% 0% 25% 9.1% 65.5% 72.2% 27.3% 69.2% 25%
254 Tellez, Rowdy pit 404 0 45.5% 10% 55.6% 9.1% 58.4% 44.7% 43.6% 50.6% 24.1%
255 Lee, Jung Hoo sf 127 0 49.6% 16.7% 65.4% 33.3% 60% 68.4% 33.3% 47.4% 0%
256 Baty, Brett nym 139 0 43.9% 0% 62.5% 16.7% 58.1% 66.7% 21.4% 42.9% 27.8%
257 Edman, Tommy la 160 0 45% 30.8% 58.3% 33.3% 68.9% 50% 8.3% 40% 8.3%
258 Mitchell, Garrett mil 216 0 44.9% 24.1% 46.4% 0% 60.3% 60% 0% 48.6% 37.5%
259 García, Adolis tex 415 0 47.2% 21.4% 41.7% 21.7% 54.4% 67.5% 33.3% 54.1% 31.7%
260 Amaya, Miguel chc 211 0 45.5% 27.3% 53.6% 42.9% 65.2% 63.5% 20% 37.8% 22.6%
261 Turner, Trea phi 330 0 46.7% 18.2% 28.6% 30% 52.9% 64.6% 17.4% 63.9% 35.8%
262 Varsho, Daulton tor 427 0 46.6% 29.2% 55.1% 16.7% 64.4% 53.4% 30% 38.8% 10.5%
263 Duran, Ezequiel tex 156 0 44.9% 12.5% 52.6% 18.8% 58.3% 80.6% 25% 31.7% 30%
264 Davis, J.D. nyy 103 0 44.7% 12.5% 25% 0% 66.7% 74.1% 25% 30% 58.3%
265 Marsh, Brandon phi 497 0 46.3% 27.3% 72.6% 37.5% 59.8% 54.8% 17.2% 30% 12%
266 Dunn, Oliver mil 103 0 47.6% 12.5% 63.6% 20% 64.3% 50% 40% 47.8% 22.2%
267 Moniak, Mickey ana 247 0 47% 16.7% 65.6% 33.3% 60.6% 76% 26.9% 42.9% 20%
268 McGuire, Reese bos 132 0 46.2% 25% 59.1% 100% 51.4% 50% 17.6% 52% 41.7%
269 LeMahieu, DJ nyy 185 0 49.7% 41.7% 86.4% 44.4% 73.7% 64.1% 20% 21.9% 0%
270 Larnach, Trevor min 364 0 47% 10.3% 21.1% 0% 56.6% 68.8% 50% 68.8% 19.4%
271 Smith, Pavin ari 152 0 46.1% 27.3% 41.2% 0% 67.4% 53.8% 20% 51.4% 14.3%
272 Grichuk, Randal ari 196 0 46.4% 9.1% 45.5% 21.4% 48% 79.7% 0% 25.8% 24%
273 Maldonado, Martín cws 106 0 45.3% 20% 71.4% 40% 57.1% 70% 25% 36% 7.1%
274 Cave, Jake col 251 0 45.4% 20.8% 42.4% 30% 60.3% 58.3% 17.2% 55.8% 30.8%
275 Carpenter, Kerry det 202 0 47.5% 10% 70.6% 28.6% 70.9% 37.5% 12.5% 54% 26.1%
276 Heyward, Jason hou 187 0 46% 33.3% 50% 18.2% 63.2% 44.7% 50% 58.8% 13.6%
277 Hampson, Garrett kc 203 0 44.8% 12.5% 31.3% 10% 55% 67.9% 23.5% 66.7% 37.9%
278 Drury, Brandon ana 312 0 47.1% 5% 20.5% 6.7% 46.5% 73.5% 42.9% 68.6% 30.2%
279 Grisham, Trent nyy 239 0 46% 0% 16.1% 0% 58.2% 53.3% 53.6% 63.8% 27.8%
280 Rodríguez, Julio sea 332 -1 44.3% 18.8% 48.9% 20% 63% 68.6% 27.3% 32.7% 16.3%
281 Edwards, Xavier mia 254 -1 43.7% 7.4% 58.8% 18.8% 53% 69.2% 28.6% 45.7% 33.3%
282 Blackmon, Charlie col 382 -1 44.2% 20% 35.3% 7.7% 47.1% 55.3% 53.8% 56.7% 39.1%
283 Langeliers, Shea oak 357 -1 45.9% 45.5% 64.3% 26.9% 50% 67.2% 27.8% 28.4% 13.6%
284 Carter, Evan tex 184 -1 41.8% 0% 9.1% 16.7% 59.6% 57.1% 48% 45.6% 8.3%
285 Pache, Cristian mia 152 -1 42.1% 0% 45.5% 25% 53.8% 82.8% 11.8% 43.3% 11.1%
286 Smith, Dominic cin 275 -1 44% 17.6% 69% 33.3% 63% 50% 16.7% 34.4% 19%
287 Alexander, Blaze ari 136 -1 39% 11.8% 50% 25% 33.3% 65.6% 12.5% 42.9% 15.4%
288 Hill, Derek mia 110 -1 40.9% 0% 27.3% 0% 64.3% 73.1% 0% 48% 10.5%
289 Davis, Henry pit 108 -1 40.7% 14.3% 42.9% 14.3% 60% 45.8% 22.2% 52.6% 36.4%
290 Hilliard, Sam col 115 -1 39.1% 0% 18.8% 0% 75% 44.4% 28.6% 31.6% 30%
291 Muncy, Max la 307 -1 44.3% 34.4% 77.8% 22.2% 52.6% 55.1% 32% 36.7% 3.3%
292 Realmuto, J.T. phi 304 -1 42.8% 0% 6.9% 11.1% 46.7% 55.7% 31.8% 65.8% 25.6%
293 Bailey, Patrick sf 363 -1 43.8% 20.7% 45% 10.5% 56.1% 63.9% 26.8% 51.8% 10.7%
294 Horwitz, Spencer tor 354 -1 43.8% 11.8% 36.4% 11.1% 60.7% 39.5% 41% 58.2% 40%
295 Campusano, Luis sd 196 -1 41.3% 13.3% 20% 8.3% 60.5% 65% 0% 28.1% 21.1%
296 Wade Jr., LaMonte sf 393 -1 43.8% 17.8% 57.5% 5.9% 67% 36% 18.2% 47.5% 12%
297 Perez, Salvador kc 284 -1 44.4% 9.1% 35% 5% 44.6% 67.7% 37.5% 65.9% 34.3%
298 Martinez, J.D. nym 433 -1 46% 9.1% 28.3% 14.7% 70% 71.4% 46.7% 47.5% 21.5%
299 Wisely, Brett sf 209 -1 42.1% 10.5% 26.3% 0% 56% 65.2% 42.3% 44% 31.3%
300 Herrera, Iván stl 229 -1 43.2% 20% 63.4% 41.2% 56.7% 63.1% 14.3% 14.7% 0%
301 Wallner, Matt min 208 -1 44.7% 0% 14.6% 9.1% 56% 63.6% 55.6% 80.6% 30.4%
302 Bauers, Jake mil 365 -1 44.9% 15.6% 36.6% 8.3% 77.3% 46.5% 47.4% 50% 18.2%
303 Harris II, Michael atl 297 -1 43.4% 11.5% 48.6% 27.3% 54.7% 65% 14.3% 50.7% 20.7%
304 DeLuca, Jonny tb 231 -1 44.2% 18.8% 48.5% 17.6% 64.5% 68% 22.2% 40% 22.9%
305 Hays, Austin phi 135 -1 39.3% 16.7% 42.9% 50% 51.9% 70.4% 14.3% 18.2% 21.1%
306 Pasquantino, Vinnie kc 436 -1 45.4% 3.7% 34.1% 20% 64.7% 65.4% 20.9% 49.6% 16.7%
307 Wells, Austin nyy 363 -1 43% 20% 60% 12.5% 58.3% 51.2% 27.9% 33.8% 25.7%
308 Gallo, Joey was 251 -1 42.6% 8.3% 25.7% 9.1% 52.5% 62.9% 40.6% 57.4% 16.7%
309 Espinal, Santiago cin 292 -1 43.2% 12.5% 44.1% 17.6% 42.1% 71.4% 36.4% 37.5% 13.9%
310 Schneemann, Daniel cle 191 -1 42.9% 16.7% 54.2% 0% 65.3% 75% 36.8% 44.4% 12.5%
311 McCann, Kyle oak 133 -1 38.3% 17.6% 40% 25% 70% 60.9% 10% 36% 7.1%
312 Sweeney, Trey det 103 -1 40.8% 0% 12.5% 0% 64.3% 54.5% 33.3% 54.2% 0%
313 Peralta, David sd 218 -1 42.7% 16% 40% 0% 51.9% 54.2% 30.8% 57.8% 33.3%
314 Carlson, Dylan tb 235 -1 43.4% 11.1% 44.4% 23.5% 63.8% 63.6% 54.2% 34.1% 6.3%
315 Butler, Lawrence oak 380 -1 44.2% 16.7% 31.4% 10.5% 54.5% 63.6% 32.4% 57.3% 18.2%
316 Fairchild, Stuart cin 155 -1 39.4% 60% 47.1% 17.6% 68.4% 68.8% 0% 24.3% 18.8%
317 Hernández, Teoscar la 501 -1 44.3% 16.7% 30.4% 18.9% 61% 71.4% 21.7% 48% 20%
318 Chisholm Jr., Jazz nyy 533 -1 45.4% 7.7% 12% 7.1% 50.3% 48.7% 45.3% 70.3% 10.7%
319 Suwinski, Jack pit 262 -1 44.7% 3.8% 36.4% 0% 64.4% 51.5% 51.9% 52.4% 16.7%
320 Short, Zack atl 105 -1 38.1% 14.3% 43.5% 16.7% 44.4% 69.6% 33.3% 31.3% 8.3%
321 France, Ty cin 360 -1 42.8% 9.1% 53.4% 37.1% 60.6% 70.7% 14.3% 19.2% 7.7%
322 Buxton, Byron min 263 -1 42.2% 14.3% 43.2% 40% 60.7% 71.1% 5.3% 37.2% 18.5%
323 Rojas, Josh sea 457 -1 44.2% 7.5% 35.8% 20% 58.9% 64.5% 14% 61.2% 21.7%
324 Singleton, Jon hou 401 -1 44.6% 35% 82.5% 33.3% 58.5% 55.6% 18.6% 29.1% 16.7%
325 Albies, Ozzie atl 236 -1 41.9% 26.7% 42.3% 25% 62.5% 61.4% 25% 47.6% 4%
326 Henderson, Gunnar bal 662 -1 45.9% 3.6% 25.5% 0% 56.2% 43.8% 38.2% 66.5% 36.1%
327 Grandal, Yasmani pit 251 -1 43.8% 15.4% 86.2% 12.5% 69.2% 57.4% 4.5% 31.4% 0%
328 Meadows, Parker det 256 -1 44.5% 25.8% 76% 15.4% 58.8% 73.3% 20% 41.9% 18.2%
329 Candelario, Jeimer cin 327 -1 44% 4.2% 43.5% 21.1% 50% 56.9% 25.8% 61.8% 29.2%
330 Burleson, Alec stl 347 -1 43.8% 23.3% 60.5% 18.2% 62.2% 34.2% 33.3% 40.4% 11.1%
331 Stanton, Giancarlo nyy 388 -1 45.4% 4% 28.9% 6.7% 67.7% 58.3% 44.4% 56.5% 25.9%
332 Scott II, Victor stl 112 -1 39.3% 7.1% 41.7% 40% 63.6% 50% 25% 33.3% 0%
333 Stowers, Kyle mia 138 -1 42.8% 4.5% 15.4% 0% 66.7% 50% 33.3% 87% 25%
334 Cameron, Daz oak 144 -1 41.7% 0% 25.9% 12.5% 50% 61.4% 20% 50% 33.3%
335 DeJong, Paul kc 269 -1 43.5% 23.1% 35.5% 17.4% 46.2% 61% 23.1% 52.2% 32.5%
336 Cronenworth, Jake sd 648 -1 44.6% 13.7% 49.6% 27.3% 55.4% 61.8% 25% 58% 22.2%
337 Tena, José was 138 -1 41.3% 12.5% 42.9% 50% 48.7% 36.4% 31.3% 72.2% 40%
338 Brown, Seth oak 286 -1 44.4% 21.7% 52.9% 9.1% 52.8% 53.5% 31% 52.3% 32.1%
339 Soderstrom, Tyler oak 155 -1 40.6% 0% 60% 20% 58.3% 46.7% 31.3% 40.5% 17.6%
340 McCann, James bal 156 -1 39.7% 28.6% 32.1% 11.1% 52.9% 68.4% 0% 44.4% 11.1%
341 Donovan, Brendan stl 547 -1 44.8% 28.6% 56.8% 10.5% 52% 62% 18.2% 49.5% 19.1%
342 Pages, Andy la 337 -1 44.2% 14.8% 28% 13.6% 63.4% 67.4% 25% 51.2% 35.7%
343 Turang, Brice mil 509 -1 46% 35.4% 80.5% 21.1% 68.1% 56.1% 14.6% 38.9% 11.4%
344 Gorman, Nolan stl 312 -1 43.6% 8.3% 47.7% 18.2% 58.3% 59.3% 15% 66.7% 15.4%
345 Wisdom, Patrick chc 151 -1 40.4% 12.5% 45.5% 50% 45% 42.9% 16.7% 44% 25%
346 Abreu, Wilyer bos 375 -1 45.1% 25% 49.2% 25% 59.3% 53.8% 33.3% 51% 18.2%
347 Suárez, Eugenio ari 524 -1 45.2% 10% 37.5% 13.3% 49.4% 82.4% 20.5% 55.3% 26.7%
348 Yelich, Christian mil 254 -1 42.1% 33.3% 64.7% 21.4% 59.5% 50% 23.8% 40.4% 20.8%
349 Gonzales, Nick pit 231 -2 38.1% 11.8% 39% 40% 65% 63.2% 14.3% 28.1% 11.9%
350 Adames, Willy mil 524 -2 43.1% 7.3% 26.5% 7.4% 54.8% 59.8% 20.6% 65.1% 28.8%
351 Riley, Austin atl 357 -2 40.9% 3.6% 38.8% 14.3% 55.2% 61.7% 16.7% 59.6% 22.2%
352 Abrams, CJ was 401 -2 41.9% 10.7% 43.1% 0% 55.2% 49.1% 37.9% 47.9% 25%
353 Naylor, Bo cle 356 -2 42.1% 15.8% 51.4% 33.3% 60.4% 65.8% 13.9% 42.3% 4.3%
354 Taylor, Chris la 225 -2 38.2% 0% 21.6% 5% 51.7% 69.2% 23.1% 54.9% 19%
355 Calhoun, Willie ana 209 -2 41.6% 38.5% 76.2% 40% 62.5% 36.4% 6.3% 22.2% 0%
356 Melendez, MJ kc 342 -2 42.1% 16.2% 30% 23.1% 56.3% 41.9% 31.3% 59.7% 32.1%
357 Turner, Justin sea 503 -2 43.1% 9.1% 30.3% 27.5% 31.8% 67.1% 20% 42.1% 30.8%
358 Machado, Manny sd 502 -2 44.4% 5% 19.6% 5.6% 47.8% 65.8% 39.3% 52.8% 29.7%
359 Torkelson, Spencer det 383 -2 42.6% 13.6% 34.8% 15.2% 51% 71.1% 18.2% 42.9% 28.6%
360 Rengifo, Luis ana 159 -2 37.1% 28.6% 63.6% 18.2% 50% 48.1% 20% 42.9% 0%
361 Contreras, Willson stl 262 -2 40.1% 35.7% 21.6% 0% 54.1% 65% 25% 46% 20%
362 Duran, Jarren bos 576 -2 43.6% 14.5% 23% 11.1% 53.5% 67.1% 25.7% 58.1% 25%
363 Kiermaier, Kevin la 189 -2 38.1% 11.1% 47.8% 33.3% 62.3% 42.9% 30% 28.1% 9.1%
364 Harper, Bryce phi 355 -2 42% 17.1% 56.9% 27.8% 47.9% 43.9% 24.4% 55.9% 34.6%
365 d'Arnaud, Travis atl 275 -2 42.2% 15.4% 27.6% 18.2% 45% 69.6% 4.8% 44.3% 29.3%
366 Benson, Will cin 341 -2 42.8% 0% 22.9% 22.2% 47.1% 58.3% 37.8% 61.1% 25%
367 Trout, Mike ana 142 -2 37.3% 0% 26% 18.8% 50% 65.5% 33.3% 64.3% 10%
368 Benintendi, Andrew cws 416 -2 41.8% 25.5% 37.5% 12.9% 70.6% 39.2% 28.1% 47.4% 8%
369 Adell, Jo ana 340 -2 41.8% 11.5% 12% 9.1% 54% 71.2% 28% 64.6% 30.4%
370 Gordon, Nick mia 153 -2 36.6% 0% 13.6% 0% 61.1% 48% 50% 71.4% 0%
371 Bell, Josh ari 426 -2 42.3% 15.6% 21.4% 12.5% 46.2% 53.8% 35.5% 59.8% 38.8%
372 Bart, Joey pit 264 -2 42% 11.8% 39% 17.6% 56.5% 67.9% 10% 36.2% 39.1%
373 Alvarez, Yordan hou 444 -2 43.7% 13.8% 34% 18.4% 61.9% 54.7% 32.4% 54.4% 17.6%
374 McNeil, Jeff nym 299 -2 41.5% 17.6% 42.4% 0% 56.5% 60.5% 36.4% 43.3% 23.8%
375 Stewart, DJ nym 198 -2 38.9% 29.2% 51.3% 0% 58.5% 39.3% 16.7% 31.3% 25%
376 Raley, Luke sea 301 -2 40.2% 30.8% 41.7% 23.1% 62.7% 60.5% 30% 32.6% 6.3%
377 Rocchio, Brayan cle 360 -2 40.8% 25.6% 80.9% 11.1% 59.7% 52.4% 10% 29.9% 5.9%
378 Rooker, Brent oak 424 -2 42% 0% 28% 13% 38.1% 74.2% 31.8% 45.3% 37.1%
379 Ramírez, José cle 556 -2 44.6% 30.2% 43.1% 18.2% 63.2% 57.5% 21.4% 42.7% 23.4%
380 Hoskins, Rhys mil 542 -2 43.2% 4.3% 34.7% 15.2% 47.4% 71.8% 25.9% 52.3% 17.3%
381 Walls, Taylor tb 229 -2 40.2% 12.5% 30.6% 0% 63.2% 58.8% 12.5% 54% 20%
382 Lopez, Nicky cws 321 -2 40.2% 31.9% 67.4% 26.7% 54.4% 53.2% 23.8% 22.9% 3.4%
383 Smith, Will la 553 -2 42.9% 20.6% 52.8% 31.7% 56.3% 56.7% 23.5% 35.1% 26.3%
384 Fraley, Jake cin 202 -2 37.6% 27.8% 62.5% 12.5% 51.4% 46.2% 15.4% 36.7% 5.6%
385 Lowe, Josh tb 324 -2 41% 2.6% 18.6% 16.7% 47.8% 70.4% 48.3% 67.9% 36.8%
386 Castro, Willi min 453 -2 43.3% 18.8% 35.1% 16.7% 67% 56.9% 37.5% 42.7% 19%
387 Heim, Jonah tex 311 -2 40.5% 17.2% 54.1% 6.3% 55.7% 52% 24.1% 43.6% 16%
388 Taylor, Michael A. pit 259 -2 42.5% 0% 14.3% 8.3% 56.1% 55.7% 40% 67.3% 23.7%
389 Castellanos, Nick phi 354 -2 43.2% 0% 10% 0% 42.9% 65.7% 57.1% 64.5% 30.1%
390 Thaiss, Matt ana 199 -2 40.7% 16.7% 48.6% 12.5% 50.8% 41.2% 42.9% 41.9% 14.3%
391 Merrill, Jackson sd 338 -3 39.9% 2.9% 33.3% 18.8% 55.6% 63% 23.3% 53.1% 20%
392 Palacios, Richie tb 286 -3 37.1% 9.1% 28.8% 33.3% 61.7% 34.4% 40% 52.5% 14.8%
393 Stephenson, Tyler cin 440 -3 40% 25% 61.8% 41.2% 54.3% 63.4% 8% 28.4% 5%
394 Haniger, Mitch sea 397 -3 40.8% 15.4% 44.2% 25% 62.5% 70.5% 9.5% 29.4% 19%
395 Giménez, Andrés cle 396 -3 41.9% 22.5% 80% 7.1% 60.6% 42.1% 15.2% 31.4% 12.1%
396 Triolo, Jared pit 413 -3 41.9% 14.3% 20% 18.2% 43.9% 66.7% 22.7% 55.8% 23.5%
397 O'Hearn, Ryan bal 386 -3 41.2% 16.2% 40.5% 0% 61.6% 48.9% 40.6% 42.7% 2.9%
398 Morel, Christopher tb 506 -3 42.5% 14.3% 15% 9.8% 62.5% 72.2% 17.6% 49.5% 24.4%
399 Naylor, Josh cle 411 -3 41.6% 24.4% 89.2% 13.3% 53.5% 56.6% 20% 29.5% 24.2%
400 Raleigh, Cal sea 422 -3 39.8% 7.4% 33.3% 11.8% 60.9% 45.5% 45.9% 35.6% 10.8%
401 Bohm, Alec phi 440 -3 41.6% 13.3% 25% 12.5% 44.4% 58.1% 41.7% 44.4% 32%
402 Swanson, Dansby chc 513 -3 41.9% 0% 23.2% 16% 53.5% 65% 33.3% 46.7% 24.7%
403 Devers, Rafael bos 416 -3 41.1% 22.4% 41.5% 8% 54.4% 53.5% 29.3% 53.4% 14.3%
404 Santana, Carlos min 560 -3 41.8% 14.7% 48.5% 12.9% 52.1% 52.8% 25% 50.8% 27.4%
405 Lowe, Brandon tb 261 -3 37.9% 29.4% 50% 14.3% 46.3% 63.2% 24.1% 36.8% 5%
406 Bellinger, Cody chc 428 -3 41.6% 4.8% 29.4% 7.1% 61.3% 39.5% 25.5% 53% 16%
407 Tucker, Kyle hou 310 -3 39.4% 16.7% 36.1% 10.5% 49.5% 52.2% 29.5% 46.9% 23.1%
408 Walker, Christian ari 445 -3 40.7% 12.5% 36.4% 24.4% 50% 67.9% 8.3% 30.1% 24.3%
409 Olson, Matt atl 569 -3 42.5% 13.3% 33.7% 3.1% 60.4% 60.5% 33.3% 51.5% 33.3%
410 Crow-Armstrong, Pete chc 193 -3 35.8% 6.7% 44.1% 25% 57.1% 45.5% 11.8% 26.9% 12.5%
411 Contreras, William mil 524 -3 41.2% 2.6% 23.1% 10.3% 55% 64.5% 39.3% 53.3% 24.1%
412 India, Jonathan cin 687 -3 42.9% 13.7% 62.5% 20.8% 43.4% 65.3% 27.3% 34.5% 19.2%
413 Lee, Korey cws 242 -3 37.6% 0% 20% 0% 73.3% 58.2% 15.4% 35% 27.5%
414 Wong, Connor bos 320 -3 40.3% 13% 55.6% 23.5% 45.5% 73.4% 0% 24.5% 17.4%
415 Tauchman, Mike chc 349 -3 38.7% 19.4% 31% 30.8% 40.8% 61.4% 20% 50.9% 26.1%
416 Guerrero Jr., Vladimir tor 516 -3 42.8% 8% 15.9% 3.8% 66.1% 57% 25.9% 59.8% 34.5%
417 Profar, Jurickson sd 589 -3 41.6% 14.8% 43.8% 16.7% 50.8% 60.6% 23.5% 49.6% 22.4%
418 Tatis Jr., Fernando sd 333 -3 39.6% 0% 16.7% 0% 42.4% 47.8% 36% 70.3% 32.6%
419 Acuña Jr., Ronald atl 200 -3 33% 5% 17.8% 0% 50% 71.1% 20% 20.8% 25%
420 Soto, Juan nyy 810 -3 43.5% 22.4% 86.7% 25% 63.1% 59.4% 25% 37.7% 5.8%
421 Lowe, Nathaniel tex 546 -4 40.3% 16% 58.1% 20.6% 53.8% 60% 9.6% 40.6% 10.8%
422 Mullins, Cedric bal 379 -4 37.2% 12.8% 32.3% 17.6% 59.3% 46.8% 34.6% 38.8% 12.5%
423 Happ, Ian chc 622 -4 41% 7.9% 33.8% 17.9% 45.9% 64.9% 20.9% 50.4% 16.7%
424 Schwarber, Kyle phi 661 -4 42.2% 24.5% 53.6% 12.5% 56.3% 57.9% 27.1% 40.7% 16.7%
425 Verdugo, Alex nyy 605 -4 41.3% 9.3% 38.7% 10.3% 64.6% 55.7% 27% 40.3% 12.1%
426 Marte, Ketel ari 441 -4 39.2% 6.1% 21.3% 7.4% 48.6% 60% 28.9% 53.8% 29.7%
427 Lindor, Francisco nym 613 -5 40.3% 14.1% 49.3% 24.1% 56.7% 55.3% 28.1% 37.9% 13.5%
428 Nimmo, Brandon nym 668 -5 40.4% 12% 30.2% 11.8% 55.9% 51.6% 21.2% 51.8% 24.4%
429 Winker, Jesse nym 533 -5 39% 11.9% 30.5% 18.6% 56.9% 52.5% 29% 53.8% 21.6%
430 Ohtani, Shohei la 625 -5 40% 26.5% 48.3% 22.7% 57.3% 46.7% 22.2% 40.4% 5.1%
431 Freeman, Freddie la 497 -5 38.6% 15.2% 27.6% 3.6% 57.1% 44.9% 32.2% 55.4% 17%
432 McMahon, Ryan col 607 -6 38.4% 15.8% 35% 15% 52.9% 60.9% 15.3% 53.3% 12%
433 Judge, Aaron nyy 712 -6 40% 0% 5.1% 0% 57.8% 58.8% 36.4% 45.2% 30.8%
434 Seager, Corey tex 342 -6 33.6% 8.1% 32% 11.1% 54.3% 54.5% 17.6% 31.6% 14.8%