Catcher framing is the art of a catcher receiving a pitch in a way that makes it more likely for an umpire to call it a strike. This page breaks down the catcher’s view into eight zones around the strike zone and shows the called strike percentage of all non-swings in that zone. Strike Rate shows the cumulative total of all zones. Catcher Framing Runs converts strikes to runs saved on a .125 run/strike basis, and includes park and pitcher adjustments. To qualify, a catcher must receive 6 called pitches per team game.
How to say it: “In 2018, Jeff Mathis converted 55 percent of non-swing pitches into called strikes in the Shadow Zone, the best rate of any catcher in baseball.”
Qualifier: For catchers 6 called pitches (i.e., takes, or non-swings) in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. For pitchers and batters 1.5 called pitches in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. (The shadow zone is essentially the edges of the strike zone, roughly one ball width inside and one ball wide outside of the zone. See what that looks like here.)
For pitchers/batters: This shows the framing that occurred behind the plate while the player in question was pitching or hitting.

This archival leaderboard is no longer supported, as it relies on an old framing model, and only shows season-level data from 2015-17. For more robust data from 2018-present using the new framing model, find the updated version of our Catcher Framing Leaderboard at this link.

View: Catcher
▾
Team
▾
All Years
▾
Min Called Pitches: 1000
▾


Rk. Catcher Team Pitches
Catcher
Framing
Runs
Strike
Rate
 Zone 11
 Zone 12
 Zone 13
 Zone 14
 Zone 16
 Zone 17
 Zone 18
 Zone 19
Grandal, Yasmani 25,512 123 50.4% 19.6% 47% 24.1% 63.3% 70.9% 33.5% 53.1% 31.1%
Hedges, Austin 20,491 89 50.6% 21.2% 47.9% 24.9% 63.8% 67% 38.3% 56.8% 29.2%
Posey, Buster sf 17,035 69 50.9% 23.7% 45% 16.1% 72.3% 67.1% 35.7% 50.6% 25.6%
Flowers, Tyler 12,506 62 51.6% 15.1% 39.2% 14.5% 68.1% 69.4% 40.4% 59.6% 34.1%
Bailey, Patrick sf 9,247 65 50.8% 23.9% 55% 28.3% 62.4% 65.5% 34.6% 54.3% 29%
Trevino, Jose 12,540 53 49.4% 18.8% 49.3% 21.9% 62.4% 68.9% 35.1% 53% 27.7%
Kirk, Alejandro tor 12,208 41 48.4% 19.6% 45.4% 17.7% 62.7% 60.6% 36.4% 57.3% 24.8%
Pérez, Roberto 12,881 41 50.1% 17.3% 44.3% 22% 67.5% 69.8% 35.9% 51.7% 28.7%
Vázquez, Christian 24,260 55 48.6% 20.2% 48.2% 25.6% 64.4% 68% 30% 49.3% 26.7%
d'Arnaud, Travis 21,381 33 48.4% 21.5% 48% 20.6% 65% 63.1% 34.2% 51.3% 24.5%
Raleigh, Cal sea 14,252 40 47.2% 21.6% 51.7% 27.1% 61.8% 63.5% 28.7% 48.2% 22.7%
Murphy, Sean 15,049 18 48.2% 19.4% 45.3% 21.5% 59.8% 66% 30.6% 55.3% 25.9%
Molina, Yadier stl 25,310 35 48.3% 22.4% 50.9% 20.9% 68.3% 65.3% 33.6% 45.2% 22.5%
Zunino, Mike 18,396 36 49% 19.1% 45.6% 22.2% 65.5% 64.7% 32.5% 54.6% 27.7%
Heim, Jonah 14,653 39 48% 20.9% 48.9% 26.2% 61% 68.1% 29.2% 48.9% 24%
Montero, Miguel 6,270 26 50.3% 14.9% 37.4% 13.9% 72.9% 65.1% 39.1% 54.9% 30.5%
Castro, Jason 14,033 25 48.9% 19.2% 40.9% 20.1% 68.5% 70.9% 33.7% 46.5% 26.5%
Norris, Derek 8,465 24 47.5% 16.2% 35.8% 14% 78.4% 59.2% 46.2% 45.3% 20.4%
Martin, Russell 13,093 29 48.4% 22.2% 40.6% 19.3% 73.2% 64% 36.2% 47.8% 23.2%
Stassi, Max 9,292 31 49.8% 19.7% 45.2% 20.8% 63.6% 70% 32.6% 55.3% 30.6%
Cervelli, Francisco 12,536 25 49% 17% 29.6% 9.1% 69.9% 63.1% 45.2% 53.3% 28.2%
Mathis, Jeff 8,171 25 51.5% 14.1% 32.3% 12.6% 62% 71.5% 40.4% 59.4% 42.6%
Higashioka, Kyle 11,745 30 48.4% 16.2% 42.2% 18.4% 62.7% 64.8% 38.6% 56.5% 29%
Wells, Austin nyy 7,164 22 46.5% 17.5% 43.1% 18.8% 56.1% 64.2% 28.7% 56.5% 29.1%
Barnes, Austin la 12,068 31 49.6% 12.1% 36.5% 12.8% 59.4% 70.4% 34.9% 61% 39.4%
Nido, Tomás 7,540 26 49.6% 15.2% 47.2% 26% 58% 74.1% 30.4% 51.5% 32.7%
Rivera, René 7,747 12 48.6% 19.5% 37.7% 13.8% 71.1% 66.4% 37.8% 48.6% 28.2%
Naylor, Bo cle 8,330 9 45.8% 21.6% 46.7% 20.6% 63.3% 63% 27.4% 46.1% 22.1%
Rogers, Jake det 8,435 9 47.8% 17.3% 46.9% 20.2% 58.8% 62.7% 32.4% 57.7% 25.1%
Alvarez, Francisco nym 7,846 16 46% 18% 48% 22.6% 56% 63.4% 32.9% 51.4% 25.1%
Maldonado, Martín 29,248 10 47.5% 19.2% 44.2% 21.3% 63.3% 65.7% 32.4% 50.2% 27.4%
Joseph, Caleb 8,959 9 47.9% 22.3% 38.4% 12.6% 75.4% 58.5% 38.5% 48.4% 23.9%
Zavala, Seby 4,235 17 50.2% 18.1% 53.9% 28% 68.3% 66.7% 35.9% 54.8% 23.3%
McGuire, Reese 8,861 17 48% 26.5% 52.8% 23.6% 64% 63.1% 29.8% 52% 21.3%
Dingler, Dillon det 4,265 7 45% 11.8% 42.3% 19.1% 51.3% 66.1% 30.1% 54.1% 25.5%
Kelly, Carson 15,999 7 47.5% 18.9% 46.2% 22.5% 62.9% 63% 33.5% 50.9% 24.2%
Murphy, John Ryan 4,674 15 50.3% 13.9% 38.7% 11.6% 72.3% 65.2% 39% 55.2% 29.4%
Plawecki, Kevin 10,384 6 48.2% 20.5% 45.7% 20.7% 66.3% 67.6% 30.3% 48.5% 22.9%
Lobatón, Jose 4,007 7 49.2% 16.8% 32.1% 8.6% 72.8% 60.8% 42.1% 52.8% 32.9%
Gallagher, Cam 5,206 12 49.6% 17.2% 44.8% 17.7% 69.2% 60.4% 45.9% 55.3% 25.7%
Heineman, Tyler 3,774 13 48.2% 15.4% 44.7% 25.2% 59.6% 65.7% 38.3% 55.1% 26.3%
Delay, Jason pit 3,246 10 48.2% 22.7% 48.9% 30.6% 52.9% 68.2% 28.3% 57.1% 26.2%
Wolters, Tony 9,545 4 47.3% 16.2% 38.9% 16.2% 65.6% 64.1% 37.4% 52.1% 27.1%
Rutschman, Adley bal 10,296 17 47.1% 26.3% 53.7% 29.5% 64.5% 62.8% 31.3% 44.4% 19.3%
Moreno, Gabriel 8,245 3 45.8% 15.6% 39.8% 14% 59% 60.4% 34.3% 56% 24%
Caratini, Victor 13,269 4 47.1% 18.3% 45.8% 21.1% 57.9% 67.7% 30.9% 49.6% 28.7%
Ross, David 2,858 6 51.1% 18.2% 34.6% 5.6% 72.4% 70.2% 37.8% 46.5% 33.2%
Kratz, Erik 3,470 9 49.4% 24.9% 46% 24.5% 66% 67.6% 37.3% 50.3% 24.3%
Serven, Brian 2,322 8 49% 20.1% 59.1% 33.7% 58% 67% 32.6% 47.9% 26.2%
Pagés, Pedro stl 4,817 2 45% 19.3% 45.8% 17.5% 56% 64% 30.7% 50.6% 20.2%
Rortvedt, Ben 5,100 8 46.4% 11.8% 47.6% 21.4% 53.1% 67.4% 29.2% 52% 30.3%
Stewart, Chris 3,237 4 48.7% 10.6% 31.3% 10.9% 68.6% 62% 43% 53.9% 32.2%
Wilson, Bobby 5,077 4 47.1% 20.2% 36.4% 9.7% 76% 62.2% 30.2% 49.4% 24%
Bemboom, Anthony 1,860 5 49.1% 18.5% 35.2% 15.4% 64% 71.1% 31.5% 53.3% 37.4%
Jackson, Alex 3,372 2 47.7% 18.9% 46.9% 20.3% 56% 68.1% 29.2% 54.1% 27.7%
Narváez, Carlos 3,325 4 42.8% 12.7% 48.4% 18% 53.3% 61.1% 23.9% 45.9% 21.4%
Garcia, Aramis 2,358 3 49.7% 19.8% 47.2% 24.1% 68.1% 67.4% 37.9% 50.3% 28.6%
Gattis, Evan 2,902 3 49.4% 11.6% 43.3% 21.4% 71.3% 69.2% 34.2% 52.6% 20.7%
Lopez, Raffy 1,427 3 49.5% 15.8% 29% 9.1% 64.2% 74.2% 26.9% 50.7% 41.1%
Piña, Manny 8,860 4 47.6% 17.4% 40.8% 17.5% 62.3% 69.5% 36% 49% 27.4%
Romine, Austin 9,654 1 47.7% 19.7% 41.3% 18.6% 68.6% 63% 39.2% 47.3% 23.8%
Sucre, Jesús 5,020 2 47.3% 13.5% 32.2% 13% 72% 59.3% 35.9% 52.5% 26.5%
Tromp, Chadwick 1,463 3 47.2% 12.6% 42.4% 13.5% 65.6% 65.1% 33.6% 50.7% 26.4%
Barrera, Tres 1,342 2 48.5% 14.8% 51.5% 9.6% 66% 63.7% 37% 51.6% 26.5%
Goodman, Hunter col 3,443 0 43.7% 15.5% 49.6% 25.7% 53.8% 62.6% 23% 45.4% 20.6%
Sabol, Blake 1,712 2 48.4% 17.4% 48.5% 26.2% 56.5% 72.2% 29.4% 53.1% 23.9%
Corporán, Carlos 1,001 2 48.3% 25% 41.5% 8.2% 79.1% 53.9% 49.1% 46.5% 19.1%
Graterol, Juan 1,083 2 48.3% 19.5% 39.8% 24% 59.9% 75.1% 34.7% 49.7% 27%
Thole, Josh 1,497 1 42.3% 18.4% 45.8% 18.5% 73.1% 59% 23.8% 36.7% 8.8%
Pozo, Yohel 1,114 2 44.2% 18.3% 49.7% 31% 61% 55.7% 29.9% 48.2% 13.7%
Fryer, Eric 1,756 1 47.9% 22.6% 30.5% 5.7% 73.6% 59.8% 33.5% 50.5% 23.7%
Susac, Andrew 1,346 1 46.1% 14% 35.3% 12.7% 70% 69.9% 35% 43.1% 20%
Astudillo, Willians 1,213 0 47% 19.7% 47.1% 16.2% 66.5% 66.4% 36.1% 45.7% 21.8%
Contreras, William 14,100 5 46.1% 17.2% 45.4% 21.1% 59% 62.4% 29.8% 52.5% 25%
Huff, Sam 1,689 2 46.8% 23.9% 48.9% 21.9% 64% 59.9% 29.8% 49.9% 27.6%
Gomes, Yan 21,947 -14 46.7% 22% 39.8% 16.3% 71% 57.5% 37.1% 48.6% 20.6%
Nuñez, Dom 2,832 0 47.4% 19.7% 36.7% 13.6% 66.7% 62.5% 43.1% 56.9% 19.2%
Herrera, Iván stl 2,399 0 46.4% 14.7% 44.1% 13.9% 61.2% 62.9% 30.8% 53.9% 27.8%
Fortes, Nick 9,239 10 46.4% 18.8% 44.5% 18.7% 58.5% 62.2% 31.3% 54.3% 24.3%
Pinto, René tb 1,923 0 48.7% 20.6% 56.2% 24.8% 57.6% 65.3% 37.4% 51.2% 29.3%
Iannetta, Chris 11,156 -2 47.2% 19.5% 40.4% 14% 71% 65% 31.9% 43.5% 28%
Ramírez, Agustín mia 2,021 1 44.1% 9.4% 42.2% 12.1% 49.8% 61.6% 34.2% 55.9% 25.4%
Rodríguez, Endy pit 1,583 -1 46.2% 13.3% 54.2% 20% 61% 60% 35.2% 49.6% 21.8%
Briceño, José ana 1,037 0 47.5% 23.9% 42.6% 35.7% 61% 74.2% 25.3% 42.2% 29.2%
Baldwin, Drake atl 2,470 -1 41.6% 14.1% 35.9% 12% 55.2% 53.9% 34.8% 47.8% 19.8%
Greiner, Grayson 3,772 -6 47.7% 27% 47.4% 18.7% 64.9% 67.1% 27.5% 46.5% 17.3%
Millas, Drew was 1,172 -1 43.9% 13% 41.4% 25.7% 55.9% 66.1% 25.5% 46.3% 23%
Conger, Hank 2,725 0 46.3% 18.2% 37% 11.3% 75.6% 61.7% 37.7% 45.3% 26.5%
McCann, Brian 13,289 -4 47.7% 15.7% 24.7% 10.2% 75.7% 58.1% 45.6% 51.7% 24.4%
Pereda, Jhonny 1,055 -2 42.9% 16.9% 55.3% 23% 51.2% 62.8% 24.7% 42.9% 18.9%
Mazeika, Patrick nym 1,078 0 47.6% 26.8% 52.4% 26.7% 64.6% 63.5% 29.5% 46.2% 18.1%
Wallach, Chad 3,381 3 47.1% 19.2% 41.1% 14% 64.5% 66% 32.5% 51.5% 28.4%
Sánchez, Ali 1,127 1 45.7% 11.6% 48.3% 25% 59.6% 61.8% 23.9% 49% 32.4%
Freitas, David 1,014 1 46.7% 27.9% 38.8% 4.2% 67.3% 63.7% 26.7% 48.3% 28.9%
Casali, Curt 11,017 -3 47.1% 19.1% 43.9% 17.5% 69.5% 61% 32.9% 49.6% 20.9%
Hicks, Liam mia 1,458 0 41.2% 18.1% 48.6% 24.5% 46.9% 60.5% 22.5% 49.6% 18.1%
Teel, Kyle cws 1,805 0 40% 13.1% 44.8% 20.4% 44.8% 62.9% 21.8% 45.1% 21.2%
Cruz, Tony 1,180 -3 44.2% 16.9% 27% 5.8% 74.6% 63.2% 29.1% 38.8% 18.8%
Varsho, Daulton 1,932 -4 46.6% 17.9% 42.6% 21.2% 62.7% 64.3% 35% 48.7% 22.3%
Robinson, Chuckie 1,346 0 45.5% 21% 55.6% 26.3% 60.8% 66% 30.5% 35.9% 20.7%
Narváez, Omar 16,511 -10 46.9% 20.5% 46.6% 22.9% 64.5% 64.3% 31.6% 45.6% 22.3%
Federowicz, Tim 1,356 -1 47.6% 20.9% 51.5% 15% 74.9% 61.5% 35.8% 42% 14.5%
Fermin, Freddy 6,724 2 46% 15.6% 41.2% 16% 58.5% 63.1% 33% 54.5% 25.2%
Soto, Geovany 2,493 -2 45.6% 13.1% 33.5% 12.4% 67.6% 64% 26.9% 48% 28%
Bandy, Jett 3,714 -2 47.1% 11.4% 37.7% 18.8% 68.3% 69.1% 38.4% 43.9% 24.7%
Rushing, Dalton la 1,000 -3 39.8% 6.3% 44.7% 19.1% 51.8% 54.2% 16% 47.3% 20.5%
Gosewisch, Tuffy 2,086 -2 45.6% 8.7% 25.1% 4.9% 67.9% 56.9% 40.6% 49.7% 22.9%
Jansen, Danny 14,510 -4 46.1% 19.7% 46.1% 16.5% 65.5% 62% 33.1% 45.8% 23.9%
Lavarnway, Ryan 1,345 -3 44.4% 30.4% 51.3% 16.9% 73.9% 57.4% 35% 36% 10.6%
Peña, Francisco 1,544 -4 45.1% 19.4% 47.6% 12.5% 68.1% 61.7% 33.7% 39% 18%
Amaya, Miguel chc 4,858 -1 46.2% 24.6% 49.7% 22.2% 55% 63.6% 31.6% 50.2% 22.9%
Brown, Trevor sf 1,604 -2 44.8% 12.9% 35.8% 3.3% 79.4% 55.4% 31.9% 39.8% 14.9%
Herrera, Jose ari 5,053 -3 43.9% 16.6% 45.1% 25.2% 54.1% 65.9% 25.6% 43% 22.8%
Pérez, Carlos 6,190 -8 45.5% 24.1% 41.1% 17.4% 70.1% 58.5% 29.9% 43.2% 18%
Maxwell, Bruce oak 2,991 -4 44.7% 15.1% 34.7% 14.2% 69.9% 58.2% 37.6% 44.3% 23.8%
McCann, Kyle oak 1,113 -5 44.9% 13.6% 42.6% 21.3% 55.6% 66% 32.8% 46.3% 22.7%
Gimenez, Chris 4,464 -2 45.6% 16.7% 32.6% 16.1% 70.8% 62.7% 35.8% 44.3% 21.4%
Marchán, Rafael phi 1,833 -5 43.6% 14.5% 39.5% 12.4% 52.5% 65.7% 27% 45.7% 32.7%
Garneau, Dustin 4,121 -4 44.3% 14.6% 38.1% 18.3% 67.7% 59.3% 33.4% 43.9% 23.1%
León, Sandy 12,493 0 48.6% 23.2% 54% 26.2% 67.3% 64.5% 29.6% 45.6% 19.3%
Murphy, Tom 7,282 -6 46.4% 18.3% 42.1% 14.3% 63.7% 61.3% 34.4% 53.6% 23.6%
Wynns, Austin 6,704 -9 45.1% 20.7% 50.7% 25.8% 61.5% 62.1% 24.8% 42.2% 19.1%
Viloria, Meibrys 2,338 -2 47% 24.1% 40.9% 26.2% 63.4% 65% 35.2% 49.4% 21.4%
Kieboom, Spencer was 1,193 -4 42.9% 16.7% 29% 15% 67.7% 61.9% 35% 42.4% 26.7%
Bart, Joey 8,154 -6 45.3% 13.4% 44.2% 22.4% 53.4% 67% 27.7% 51% 25.2%
Hicks, John 3,189 -8 46.4% 19.9% 41% 22.1% 67.2% 67.6% 31.9% 40.9% 20.2%
Torrens, Luis 6,884 -13 43.9% 15% 41.8% 16.1% 61.5% 60.7% 27.2% 48.2% 20.6%
Davis, Henry pit 3,070 -5 41.4% 11.3% 43.6% 17.3% 46.9% 62.7% 21.2% 49.4% 22.2%
Sánchez, Héctor 1,213 -5 39.5% 26.8% 32.9% 13% 67.3% 55.3% 27% 28% 16.7%
Alfaro, Jorge 11,591 -8 47.2% 22.6% 50.1% 24.4% 65.1% 62% 28.8% 47.1% 20.9%
Jeffers, Ryan min 11,019 -3 45.7% 20.8% 49.3% 18.2% 60.3% 60.8% 33.1% 49.1% 21.6%
Peña, Brayan 2,536 -6 43.7% 21.5% 33.6% 15.6% 71.8% 59.3% 36.8% 35% 18.7%
Thaiss, Matt 4,805 -13 43.1% 18.6% 43.3% 19.2% 54% 65.4% 21.5% 47.8% 18.2%
Knapp, Andrew 5,982 -16 46.6% 18.4% 45.4% 19.3% 66.3% 61.1% 37.3% 44.9% 22.8%
Hanigan, Ryan 3,490 -7 44.1% 20.6% 45% 18.7% 69.5% 53.5% 33.5% 43.9% 16%
Recker, Anthony 1,489 -7 41.8% 10.3% 29% 8.7% 70.4% 59.7% 23.5% 39.8% 17.2%
Bethancourt, Christian 7,463 -9 46.1% 21.9% 44.6% 22% 71% 59.5% 30.8% 46.5% 17.3%
Swihart, Blake 3,431 -9 43.6% 15.2% 38.9% 19% 63.8% 65.6% 25% 36.8% 23.7%
Maile, Luke 10,645 -4 45.4% 19.4% 48.8% 24% 63.8% 65.4% 26.4% 43.9% 22%
Holaday, Bryan 4,471 -11 44.4% 10.8% 29.4% 12.2% 64.4% 64.1% 32.3% 44.4% 28.2%
Smith, Kevan 6,196 -10 45.8% 20% 52.4% 23.7% 68.2% 66.8% 24.9% 36.4% 19.8%
Phegley, Josh 7,385 -13 46.4% 14.8% 32.1% 12.4% 70.5% 59.5% 34.1% 50.1% 26.5%
Quero, Edgar cws 1,944 -13 37% 6% 43% 19.6% 39.4% 57% 13.9% 42.3% 19.7%
Lee, Korey 4,137 -11 43.4% 19.2% 45.4% 14.2% 59.7% 59.8% 26.8% 48.6% 19.7%
Campusano, Luis sd 3,819 -9 44.9% 15.7% 46.9% 22.6% 48.7% 71.3% 23.2% 49.4% 27%
Avila, Alex 9,146 -7 46.1% 16.7% 40.4% 17.1% 68.3% 62.5% 31.5% 44.5% 23.1%
Ramos, Wilson 16,583 -13 46.3% 27.6% 52.9% 23.6% 73.3% 60.3% 27.9% 34.6% 14.6%
Vogt, Stephen 11,847 -10 46.3% 16.2% 36.7% 19.2% 67.8% 64.7% 30.6% 43% 27.2%
Nola, Austin 7,679 -10 46.9% 18.1% 44.8% 22.2% 58.2% 64.3% 31.4% 54.2% 26.9%
Pérez, Michael 4,677 -14 44.9% 18.7% 52.6% 22.4% 61.8% 60.2% 26.4% 46% 17.8%
Stubbs, Garrett 3,889 -15 43.3% 16.3% 37% 18.6% 55.3% 56.9% 30.7% 53.6% 21.4%
Sánchez, Gary 19,053 -12 47.1% 20% 44.7% 19.8% 65.5% 68.1% 26.9% 46.2% 26.3%
Kiner-Falefa, Isiah 2,097 -21 41.8% 16.5% 35.4% 10.7% 64% 52.5% 22.7% 47% 19.4%
Saltalamacchia, Jarrod 3,315 -11 43.5% 19.5% 36.9% 19.5% 73.4% 62.2% 25% 31% 18.1%
Wong, Connor bos 8,099 -15 44.4% 12.3% 43.7% 23.7% 53.4% 68% 27.6% 48.5% 19.8%
Melendez, MJ kc 2,308 -16 42.1% 13.1% 38.5% 12.8% 55.2% 59.9% 27.9% 46.5% 21.9%
Sisco, Chance 4,037 -20 44.8% 16.1% 37.1% 19.1% 69.4% 58.1% 35.4% 45% 20.9%
Navarro, Dioner 3,734 -12 43.4% 22.9% 42.5% 24.5% 69.8% 64.2% 22.3% 28.3% 13.7%
Collins, Zack 2,339 -17 41.3% 20.9% 49.2% 17.9% 70.7% 49% 20.6% 36.8% 14.2%
O'Hoppe, Logan ana 8,082 -14 42.5% 21.2% 45.9% 18.8% 58.2% 55.7% 29.5% 44.5% 17.7%
Haase, Eric 6,859 -16 45.2% 16.1% 42.1% 20.1% 61.3% 61.9% 31.2% 49.4% 20.4%
Herrmann, Chris 4,051 -15 44.6% 14% 37.1% 13.2% 63.9% 65.7% 28.1% 41.3% 25.9%
Centeno, Juan 2,581 -16 40.8% 10.7% 29.7% 7.9% 70.1% 51.2% 30.5% 37.3% 15.1%
Stallings, Jacob 14,374 -3 45.9% 14.9% 42.8% 19.3% 59.2% 64.4% 30.8% 50.6% 26.8%
Knizner, Andrew 8,004 -22 44.2% 19.4% 52.2% 26.3% 58.2% 65.3% 27% 38.5% 18.6%
Garver, Mitch 9,635 -11 45.2% 15.1% 42.2% 19.4% 61.8% 63% 32.3% 47.6% 23.8%
Ellis, A.J. 5,498 -18 42.5% 19.3% 44.5% 12.3% 72% 58% 25.8% 33.8% 13%
Mesoraco, Devin 3,595 -14 43.1% 14.4% 32.6% 10.7% 68% 58.3% 28.8% 46% 19%
Pierzynski, A.J. 4,826 -15 43.5% 18.2% 36.2% 12.8% 75.9% 56.8% 35.3% 36% 15.1%
Langeliers, Shea oak 11,065 -25 42.9% 15.7% 45.7% 20.9% 51.4% 66% 21.1% 43.8% 21.2%
Cabrera, Ramón cin 1,539 -16 36.6% 10% 23.8% 10.4% 62.1% 50.5% 43.1% 34.8% 16%
Castillo, Welington 11,162 -17 45.6% 13% 32.5% 10.2% 66.6% 63% 33.8% 47.2% 25.4%
Mejía, Francisco 7,119 -17 45.6% 15.3% 45.7% 18.8% 60.1% 63.3% 30.3% 51% 26.1%
Stephenson, Tyler cin 11,294 -25 43.9% 20.2% 49.4% 26.8% 57.1% 62.1% 23.9% 43.4% 19.5%
Realmuto, J.T. 37,672 -32 46.3% 16.7% 38.1% 14.5% 68.4% 59.1% 35.5% 48.9% 22.6%
Diaz, Yainer hou 7,767 -10 42.9% 17.1% 49.2% 22.4% 58.5% 59.3% 24.2% 44.1% 18.6%
Butera, Drew 6,316 -19 43.9% 14.8% 31.9% 9.7% 69% 59.1% 37.7% 45.3% 20%
Rupp, Cameron phi 7,791 -18 44.8% 18% 35.6% 15.3% 70.5% 61.3% 27.1% 43.5% 19.7%
Lucroy, Jonathan 15,110 -23 45% 14.7% 32.1% 13.4% 67.3% 60.5% 32.3% 48.8% 24.6%
Severino, Pedro 9,015 -25 45.2% 17.9% 42% 17.8% 65.6% 60.1% 32.5% 48.4% 21.7%
Contreras, Willson 22,158 -25 46.9% 17.7% 45.5% 21.7% 63% 64.9% 31.4% 46.4% 25.1%
Barnhart, Tucker 22,737 -14 46.2% 15.9% 37.1% 16.2% 64.7% 62.7% 35.1% 51% 25.1%
Ruiz, Carlos 5,354 -24 42.5% 14.7% 26.8% 11.8% 72% 48.2% 35.2% 45.8% 14.2%
Ruiz, Keibert 12,665 -29 43.5% 21% 48.4% 24.2% 62.2% 59.7% 23.8% 42% 17.3%
Adams, Riley was 6,736 -32 41.3% 14.8% 43.7% 18.7% 57.2% 56.4% 26.4% 45.4% 14.2%
Smith, Will la 19,377 -12 45.3% 17.4% 44.9% 19.7% 59.2% 63.5% 26.6% 50.7% 24.4%
Hundley, Nick 10,182 -28 43.7% 16.4% 38.6% 16.3% 66.1% 65.8% 27% 36.4% 19.5%
Wieters, Matt 11,901 -36 43.6% 23.7% 38.1% 13.1% 75.2% 53.4% 32.6% 38.7% 14.8%
Díaz, Elias 19,732 -43 44.4% 25% 50.4% 23.8% 66.3% 54.7% 31.5% 40.4% 15.6%
Suzuki, Kurt 17,299 -41 45.8% 18.5% 38.3% 14.4% 67.7% 63.2% 32.8% 43.5% 21.9%
McCann, James 24,499 -41 45.6% 20.3% 44.4% 20.2% 64.3% 64.1% 28.3% 45.8% 19.4%
Chirinos, Robinson 16,091 -52 44.8% 15% 37.5% 13.7% 64.2% 62.9% 31.1% 47.2% 23.1%
Perez, Salvador kc 29,061 -91 43.9% 19.8% 43.2% 18.5% 66.2% 59% 30.2% 41.4% 19.6%