<
>

Catcher framing is the art of a catcher receiving a pitch in a way that makes it more likely for an umpire to call it a strike. This page breaks down the catcher’s view into eight zones around the strike zone and shows the called strike percentage of all non-swings in that zone. Strike Rate shows the cumulative total of all zones. Catcher Framing Runs converts strikes to runs saved on a .125 run/strike basis, and includes park and pitcher adjustments. To qualify, a catcher must receive 6 called pitches per team game.
How to say it: “In 2018, Jeff Mathis converted 55 percent of non-swing pitches into called strikes in the Shadow Zone, the best rate of any catcher in baseball.”
Qualifier: For catchers 6 called pitches (i.e., takes, or non-swings) in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. For pitchers and batters 1.5 called pitches in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. (The shadow zone is essentially the edges of the strike zone, roughly one ball width inside and one ball wide outside of the zone. See what that looks like here.)
For pitchers/batters: This shows the framing that occurred behind the plate while the player in question was pitching or hitting.


Rk. Catcher Team Pitches
Catcher
Framing
Runs
Strike
Rate
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Zone 19
1 Grandal, Yasmani 25,512 103 50.4% 19.6% 47% 24.1% 63.3% 70.9% 33.5% 53.1% 31.1%
2 Posey, Buster sf 17,035 65 50.9% 23.7% 45% 16.1% 72.3% 67.1% 35.7% 50.6% 25.6%
3 Hedges, Austin 19,170 62 50.7% 21% 47.6% 24.2% 64.2% 67.1% 38.5% 57% 29.4%
4 Flowers, Tyler 12,506 59 51.6% 15.1% 39.2% 14.5% 68.1% 69.4% 40.4% 59.6% 34.1%
5 Trevino, Jose 10,548 41 50.8% 20.1% 49.8% 22.4% 66.4% 68.7% 37.2% 54.6% 28.6%
6 d'Arnaud, Travis 19,955 38 49% 21.4% 48% 21.2% 66% 63.5% 35.9% 52.1% 25.2%
7 Vázquez, Christian 22,947 38 49% 20.2% 49.1% 26.3% 65.1% 68.6% 30.3% 49.3% 26.9%
8 Pérez, Roberto 12,881 37 50.1% 17.3% 44.3% 22% 67.5% 69.8% 35.9% 51.7% 28.7%
9 Bailey, Patrick sf 6,317 33 52% 24.5% 54.6% 28.8% 62.6% 67.7% 34% 56.3% 31.6%
10 Raleigh, Cal sea 11,099 31 48.3% 22.9% 53.4% 26.4% 63.2% 64.4% 30.9% 48.7% 24.7%
11 Heim, Jonah 12,372 30 49.2% 22.6% 50.7% 28.1% 63.4% 69.5% 30.6% 48.5% 24.1%
12 Molina, Yadier stl 25,310 30 48.3% 22.4% 50.9% 20.9% 68.3% 65.3% 33.6% 45.2% 22.5%
13 Zunino, Mike 18,396 28 49% 19.1% 45.6% 22.2% 65.5% 64.7% 32.5% 54.6% 27.7%
14 Murphy, Sean 13,206 28 48.8% 20.2% 46.2% 21.8% 60.4% 66.6% 31.2% 56.3% 25.9%
15 Montero, Miguel 6,270 25 50.3% 14.9% 37.4% 13.9% 72.9% 65.1% 39.1% 54.9% 30.5%
16 Martin, Russell 13,093 24 48.4% 22.2% 40.6% 19.3% 73.2% 64% 36.2% 47.8% 23.2%
17 Stassi, Max 9,292 24 49.8% 19.7% 45.2% 20.8% 63.6% 70% 32.6% 55.3% 30.6%
18 Norris, Derek 8,465 24 47.5% 16.2% 35.8% 14% 78.4% 59.2% 46.2% 45.3% 20.4%
19 Castro, Jason 14,033 24 48.9% 19.2% 40.9% 20.1% 68.5% 70.9% 33.7% 46.5% 26.5%
20 Kirk, Alejandro tor 9,016 24 49.3% 20.2% 46.2% 16% 65.5% 60.2% 38.1% 58.2% 25.3%
21 Cervelli, Francisco 12,536 23 49% 17% 29.6% 9.1% 69.9% 63.1% 45.2% 53.3% 28.2%
22 Mathis, Jeff 8,171 22 51.5% 14.1% 32.3% 12.6% 62% 71.5% 40.4% 59.4% 42.6%
23 Higashioka, Kyle 10,166 20 49.4% 16.5% 43.7% 18.8% 65% 66.1% 37.9% 57.1% 29.8%
24 Barnes, Austin la 11,928 17 49.6% 12.1% 36.3% 12.7% 59.4% 70.6% 34.7% 60.9% 39.4%
25 Alvarez, Francisco nym 5,873 16 47.8% 18.2% 48.6% 25.1% 59.4% 64.9% 35.9% 53.2% 26.6%
26 Nido, Tomás 7,376 15 49.7% 15.3% 47.2% 25.9% 58.3% 74.1% 30.5% 51.5% 33%
27 Rivera, René 7,747 15 48.6% 19.5% 37.7% 13.8% 71.1% 66.4% 37.8% 48.6% 28.2%
28 Maldonado, Martín 28,216 12 47.7% 19.4% 44.2% 21.2% 63.8% 66% 32.7% 50.3% 27.5%
29 Wells, Austin nyy 4,257 12 48.1% 20.9% 48.4% 22.1% 57.8% 66.3% 29.4% 54.8% 30.5%
30 Rogers, Jake det 7,491 11 48.8% 17.8% 47.4% 20.5% 59.6% 64.3% 33.3% 58.6% 26.3%
31 Naylor, Bo cle 5,423 11 48.3% 24.1% 48.9% 21.2% 66.7% 66.8% 32.1% 47.9% 22.5%
32 Joseph, Caleb 8,959 11 47.9% 22.3% 38.4% 12.6% 75.4% 58.5% 38.5% 48.4% 23.9%
33 Caratini, Victor 11,971 10 47.9% 18.1% 45.7% 21.1% 59.1% 68.2% 32.4% 50.4% 29.6%
34 Zavala, Seby 4,235 10 50.2% 18.1% 53.9% 28% 68.3% 66.7% 35.9% 54.8% 23.3%
35 Kelly, Carson 13,451 9 48.5% 18.5% 46.2% 21.9% 64.5% 63.9% 35.6% 51.6% 25.4%
36 Plawecki, Kevin 10,384 8 48.2% 20.5% 45.7% 20.7% 66.3% 67.6% 30.3% 48.5% 22.9%
37 Murphy, John Ryan 4,674 8 50.3% 13.9% 38.7% 11.6% 72.3% 65.2% 39% 55.2% 29.4%
38 McGuire, Reese 7,789 8 48.5% 27.2% 51.1% 23% 64.6% 63.6% 31.3% 53% 22.9%
39 Gallagher, Cam 5,206 8 49.6% 17.2% 44.8% 17.7% 69.2% 60.4% 45.9% 55.3% 25.7%
40 Lobaton, Jose 4,007 8 49.2% 16.8% 32.1% 8.6% 72.8% 60.8% 42.1% 52.8% 32.9%
41 Delay, Jason pit 3,246 7 48.2% 22.7% 48.9% 30.6% 52.9% 68.2% 28.3% 57.1% 26.2%
42 Wolters, Tony 9,545 7 47.3% 16.2% 38.9% 16.2% 65.6% 64.1% 37.4% 52.1% 27.1%
43 Kratz, Erik 3,470 6 49.4% 24.9% 46% 24.5% 66% 67.6% 37.3% 50.3% 24.3%
44 Serven, Brian 2,322 6 49% 20.1% 59.1% 33.7% 58% 67% 32.6% 47.9% 26.2%
45 Ross, David 2,858 6 51.1% 18.2% 34.6% 5.6% 72.4% 70.2% 37.8% 46.5% 33.2%
46 Rutschman, Adley bal 8,981 5 47.5% 27.4% 55.4% 30.7% 65.6% 62.6% 30.7% 44.6% 18.5%
47 Stewart, Chris 3,237 5 48.7% 10.6% 31.3% 10.9% 68.6% 62% 43% 53.9% 32.2%
48 Wilson, Bobby 5,077 4 47.1% 20.2% 36.4% 9.7% 76% 62.2% 30.2% 49.4% 24%
49 Heineman, Tyler 2,594 4 48.7% 14.4% 44.4% 24.1% 61% 66.7% 37.4% 57.2% 26.2%
50 Rortvedt, Ben 4,195 4 47.3% 11.4% 48.8% 22.1% 53.8% 68.9% 30.1% 53.2% 31.6%
51 Bemboom, Anthony 1,860 4 49.1% 18.5% 35.2% 15.4% 64% 71.1% 31.5% 53.3% 37.4%
52 Romine, Austin 9,654 3 47.7% 19.7% 41.3% 18.6% 68.6% 63% 39.2% 47.3% 23.8%
53 Gattis, Evan 2,902 3 49.4% 11.6% 43.3% 21.4% 71.3% 69.2% 34.2% 52.6% 20.7%
54 Garcia, Aramis 2,328 3 49.8% 19.4% 47.7% 24.3% 68.4% 67.5% 38.1% 50.4% 28.5%
55 Moreno, Gabriel 6,739 3 46.4% 15.4% 40% 14.2% 58.5% 61.4% 34.7% 57.6% 24.5%
56 Lopez, Raffy 1,427 3 49.5% 15.8% 29% 9.1% 64.2% 74.2% 26.9% 50.7% 41.1%
57 Piña, Manny 8,860 3 47.6% 17.4% 40.8% 17.5% 62.3% 69.5% 36% 49% 27.4%
58 Barrera, Tres 1,342 2 48.5% 14.8% 51.5% 9.6% 66% 63.7% 37% 51.6% 26.5%
59 Jansen, Danny 12,621 2 47.1% 20.6% 46.4% 17.3% 67.5% 62.8% 34% 46.9% 24.5%
60 Corporán, Carlos 1,001 2 48.3% 25% 41.5% 8.2% 79.1% 53.9% 49.1% 46.5% 19.1%
61 Contreras, William 10,675 2 47% 16.2% 45.9% 22% 59.1% 64.1% 31.4% 53.3% 26%
62 Tromp, Chadwick 1,328 2 48.3% 13.3% 42.9% 13.2% 68.4% 65.1% 34.9% 51% 27.9%
63 Sabol, Blake 1,712 2 48.4% 17.4% 48.5% 26.2% 56.5% 72.2% 29.4% 53.1% 23.9%
64 Sucre, Jesús 5,020 2 47.3% 13.5% 32.2% 13% 72% 59.3% 35.9% 52.5% 26.5%
65 Nottingham, Jacob 820 1 47.6% 13.7% 34.8% 16.7% 64.9% 68.7% 32% 54.5% 24.7%
66 Driscoll, Logan tb 250 1 52.8% 27.8% 66.7% 46.2% 60% 65% 30% 50% 22.7%
67 Fryer, Eric 1,756 1 47.9% 22.6% 30.5% 5.7% 73.6% 59.8% 33.5% 50.5% 23.7%
68 Herrera, Iván stl 2,217 1 46.8% 15.4% 44.9% 14.2% 64.3% 63.3% 31.3% 52.1% 27.8%
69 Huff, Sam 1,457 1 47.4% 24% 47.2% 22.2% 64.1% 60% 32.8% 51.6% 29.4%
70 Graterol, Juan 1,083 1 48.3% 19.5% 39.8% 24% 59.9% 75.1% 34.7% 49.7% 27%
71 Nuñez, Dom 2,770 1 47.5% 19.7% 36.5% 13.7% 66.9% 61.9% 43.5% 57.6% 19.2%
72 Dingler, Dillon det 1,175 1 46.3% 12.8% 38.3% 24% 46.7% 72.4% 30.7% 57.2% 27.8%
73 Senger, Hayden nym 286 1 52.4% 33.3% 50% 33.3% 54.2% 78.1% 21.1% 56.2% 25.9%
74 Jackson, Alex 2,508 1 48.9% 15.8% 48% 19.4% 58.4% 70.6% 30.3% 55.8% 28.1%
75 Gomes, Yan 21,947 1 46.7% 22% 39.8% 16.3% 71% 57.5% 37.1% 48.6% 20.6%
76 Narváez, Carlos 681 1 44.9% 18.9% 53.5% 19.5% 60.8% 64.6% 29.4% 40.4% 16.4%
77 Escarra, J.C. nyy 189 1 55% 23.5% 66.7% 62.5% 51.5% 69.2% 25% 69% 37.5%
78 Astudillo, Willians 1,213 1 47% 19.7% 47.1% 16.2% 66.5% 66.4% 36.1% 45.7% 21.8%
79 Thole, Josh 1,497 1 42.3% 18.4% 45.8% 18.5% 73.1% 59% 23.8% 36.7% 8.8%
80 Salazar, César hou 350 1 52.6% 12.5% 58% 0% 69.3% 75% 25.9% 55.2% 28.6%
81 Romo, Drew col 379 1 47.5% 27.8% 48.8% 15% 56.6% 67.7% 33.3% 47.7% 27.8%
82 Allen, Austin 858 1 48.6% 22.2% 42% 11.6% 68.3% 67.8% 27.7% 49.7% 25.7%
83 Susac, Andrew 1,346 1 46.1% 14% 35.3% 12.7% 70% 69.9% 35% 43.1% 20%
84 Pinto, René 1,923 1 48.7% 20.6% 56.2% 24.8% 57.6% 65.3% 37.4% 51.2% 29.3%
85 Sánchez, Ali 949 0 45.5% 13% 49.3% 25% 59.5% 62.7% 25.3% 47.5% 29.6%
86 Farmer, Kyle 293 0 42% 18.5% 45.2% 21.7% 71.8% 62.3% 5.9% 36.8% 20%
87 Conger, Hank 2,725 0 46.3% 18.2% 37% 11.3% 75.6% 61.7% 37.7% 45.3% 26.5%
88 Nieves, Wil 129 0 41.1% 66.7% 31.3% 0% 95% 37% 20% 28.1% 16.7%
89 Mazeika, Patrick nym 1,078 0 47.6% 26.8% 52.4% 26.7% 64.6% 63.5% 29.5% 46.2% 18.1%
90 Hudson, Joe 348 0 49.4% 23.1% 49.1% 8.3% 71% 61.9% 46.7% 52.5% 14.7%
91 Rosario, Alberto stl 283 0 45.6% 9.1% 22.7% 16.7% 74.6% 42.3% 47.2% 48.4% 25.7%
92 Henry, Payton 449 0 47% 20% 42.6% 25% 67.7% 51.2% 32.4% 59.3% 13.5%
93 Pagés, Pedro stl 2,286 0 45.3% 25% 46.5% 15% 60.7% 61.2% 28.7% 48.4% 19.1%
94 Baron, Steven 212 0 48.6% 7.7% 40% 12.5% 82% 53.6% 37.9% 55.3% 9.1%
95 Taylor, Beau 508 0 49.8% 15.2% 49% 20.8% 65.4% 72.7% 27.8% 54.1% 27%
96 Wallach, Chad 3,373 0 47.1% 19.2% 41.1% 13.5% 64.3% 66% 32.2% 51.6% 28.5%
97 Freitas, David 1,014 0 46.7% 27.9% 38.8% 4.2% 67.3% 63.7% 26.7% 48.3% 28.9%
98 Papierski, Michael cin 920 0 45.5% 28.8% 47% 27% 55.6% 65.9% 15.6% 51.5% 23.6%
99 Fortes, Nick mia 7,480 0 47% 20.6% 45% 19.7% 59.3% 63.7% 31.4% 53.5% 25.1%
100 McBride, Matt 321 0 43.6% 19% 33.3% 0% 74.1% 61.8% 23.5% 36.8% 8.8%
101 Kolozsvary, Mark 202 0 47% 19% 48.5% 27.3% 52.8% 73.3% 22.2% 50% 13.3%
102 Gale, Rocky 223 0 47.5% 11.1% 55.2% 0% 67.7% 76.5% 47.1% 38.1% 19%
103 O'Keefe, Brian 155 0 41.9% 16.7% 64% 30% 50% 67.7% 0% 40% 5.3%
104 Reetz, Jakson 127 0 55.9% 40% 47.1% 45.5% 61.3% 74.1% 50% 64.7% 18.2%
105 Godoy, José 491 0 47.3% 14.7% 47.9% 21.7% 65.3% 61% 38.2% 51.9% 15.9%
106 Solano, Jhonatan 163 0 48.5% 22.2% 33.3% 11.1% 69% 75.8% 16.7% 57.1% 16.7%
107 Lavastida, Bryan 118 0 38.1% 9.1% 52.6% 7.7% 62.5% 61.5% 22.2% 40.7% 20%
108 Baldwin, Drake atl 294 0 46.3% 4.8% 52.2% 11.1% 55.6% 50% 36.8% 59% 29%
109 Ashley, Nevin mil 151 0 39.7% 25% 42.9% 11.1% 88.9% 50% 25% 40% 13.8%
110 Pozo, Yohel 215 0 44.7% 18.2% 51.4% 22.2% 67.6% 61.5% 22.2% 42.2% 13.3%
111 Rivas, Webster sd 586 0 46.6% 20% 51.6% 12.1% 65.1% 62.2% 37.5% 48.1% 27.4%
112 Hamilton, Caleb 184 0 46.2% 10% 37.5% 44.4% 50% 68.8% 16.7% 64.3% 23.8%
113 Pereda, Jhonny 510 0 44.1% 23.5% 54.3% 12.2% 54.1% 70.1% 30.8% 38% 24.4%
114 Read, Raudy was 128 0 28.1% 14.3% 20.8% 0% 41.7% 62.5% 0% 19% 5.6%
115 Quero, Edgar cws 181 0 35.4% 0% 52.6% 40% 23.1% 54.1% 16.7% 51.2% 10.5%
116 Okey, Chris 154 0 41.6% 7.7% 33.3% 0% 46.2% 70% 45.5% 50% 27.8%
117 Iannetta, Chris 11,156 0 47.2% 19.5% 40.4% 14% 71% 65% 31.9% 43.5% 28%
118 Davis, Taylor 221 0 49.3% 35% 46.4% 28.6% 72.4% 80.6% 38.5% 49.2% 18.8%
119 Rivero, Sebastián 647 0 45.3% 28.8% 50.7% 26.7% 58.6% 64.8% 25% 40.9% 25%
120 Hernández, Óscar 369 0 44.4% 13% 34.4% 6.7% 72.6% 71.9% 26.8% 39.2% 21.3%
121 Pacheco, Jordan 434 0 45.6% 15.4% 23.8% 18.8% 81.3% 54.7% 44.4% 41.9% 18.2%
122 Schwarber, Kyle 491 0 49.5% 18.2% 45.5% 10.5% 70% 73.6% 30.8% 33.7% 40.5%
123 Greiner, Grayson 3,772 0 47.7% 27% 47.4% 18.7% 64.9% 67.1% 27.5% 46.5% 17.3%
124 Porter, Logan 250 0 48.4% 15.4% 51.5% 0% 51.8% 77.4% 41.7% 50.7% 26.3%
125 Moore, Adam 286 0 41.3% 30% 45.5% 18.2% 61.7% 41.4% 26.1% 36.2% 30.4%
126 McCann, Brian 13,289 0 47.7% 15.7% 24.7% 10.2% 75.7% 58.1% 45.6% 51.7% 24.4%
127 Briceño, José ana 1,037 0 47.5% 23.9% 42.6% 35.7% 61% 74.2% 25.3% 42.2% 29.2%
128 Pineda, Israel was 125 0 45.6% 25% 52% 57.1% 50% 64.5% 14.3% 33.3% 15.4%
129 Ohlman, Mike tor 107 0 43% 16.7% 22.2% 25% 45.5% 80% 25% 54.5% 33.3%
130 Casali, Curt 11,016 -1 47.1% 19.1% 43.9% 17.5% 69.5% 61% 32.9% 49.6% 20.9%
131 Del Castillo, Adrian ari 608 -1 46.1% 20.6% 47.5% 17.4% 61.7% 61.1% 38% 47.5% 23.8%
132 Odom, Joseph 464 -1 43.5% 14.3% 53.5% 27.8% 54.7% 55.4% 15.6% 48% 30.4%
133 Robinson, Chuckie 1,316 -1 45.8% 19.8% 56.6% 26.3% 61.6% 65.8% 31.6% 36.3% 20.9%
134 Monell, Johnny 254 -1 40.6% 5.3% 28.6% 0% 70.9% 57.1% 38.1% 36.8% 18.5%
135 Pérez, Carlos cws 547 -1 42.6% 27.7% 46.9% 21.1% 58.6% 57% 28.9% 44.4% 13.4%
136 Goodman, Hunter col 983 -1 42.9% 17.6% 42.7% 24.1% 55.7% 65.4% 15.7% 42.9% 18.2%
137 Herrera, Jose ari 3,652 -1 45.3% 19.1% 45.3% 26.2% 56.5% 66.8% 28% 42.4% 23.2%
138 McKenry, Michael 850 -1 46.6% 26.2% 47.8% 10.5% 79% 55.3% 36.6% 44.8% 12.8%
139 Marjama, Mike sea 309 -1 40.5% 4% 21.4% 15.4% 74.5% 67.2% 24% 35.9% 19%
140 Rodríguez, Endy pit 1,522 -1 46.4% 12.9% 54.1% 20% 62.1% 60.7% 35.6% 48.8% 22.6%
141 Varsho, Daulton 1,932 -1 46.6% 17.9% 42.6% 21.2% 62.7% 64.3% 35% 48.7% 22.3%
142 Ciuffo, Nick 457 -1 43.3% 14.3% 44.1% 13% 67.9% 58.7% 26.9% 42.5% 17%
143 Narváez, Omar 16,511 -1 46.9% 20.5% 46.6% 22.9% 64.5% 64.3% 31.6% 45.6% 22.3%
144 Cruz, Tony 1,180 -1 44.2% 16.9% 27% 5.8% 74.6% 63.2% 29.1% 38.8% 18.8%
145 Millas, Drew was 693 -1 44.3% 10.8% 36.4% 27.7% 56.5% 72.4% 14.5% 44.4% 25%
146 Hicks, Liam mia 507 -1 40.4% 16.1% 44.2% 25% 38.9% 61.8% 27.6% 47.4% 22.5%
147 Telis, Tomás 302 -1 32.8% 13.6% 30.8% 0% 69.1% 36.6% 22.6% 32.9% 2.9%
148 Fry, David cle 813 -1 41.2% 8.2% 30% 11.5% 61.5% 56.4% 40.3% 42.3% 26.5%
149 Turner, Stuart cin 669 -1 43.5% 18.8% 36.2% 15.2% 59.4% 63.9% 40% 38% 22.8%
150 Marchán, Rafael phi 1,099 -1 44.3% 10.5% 40.2% 12.7% 57.1% 63.6% 28.6% 46.7% 32.1%
151 Fermin, Freddy kc 4,372 -1 47.3% 13.5% 41.9% 18.2% 58.8% 63.8% 33.4% 58.2% 27.4%
152 Federowicz, Tim 1,356 -1 47.6% 20.9% 51.5% 15% 74.9% 61.5% 35.8% 42% 14.5%
153 Soderstrom, Tyler oak 477 -1 41.1% 6.5% 48.5% 16.2% 62.1% 52.5% 27.8% 43.6% 10.3%
154 Arencibia, J.P. 530 -1 42.8% 28.6% 27.1% 0% 82.2% 48.9% 34.8% 42.6% 17.5%
155 Soto, Geovany 2,493 -2 45.6% 13.1% 33.5% 12.4% 67.6% 64% 26.9% 48% 28%
156 Dini, Nick kc 512 -2 42.6% 8.1% 28.6% 10.5% 54.8% 61.5% 40% 45.5% 35.5%
157 Hayes, Brett 286 -2 36% 18.2% 31.8% 0% 56.8% 56.9% 9.5% 40.9% 11.8%
158 Peña, Francisco 1,544 -2 45.1% 19.4% 47.6% 12.5% 68.1% 61.7% 33.7% 39% 18%
159 Hummel, Cooper 433 -2 37.9% 4.5% 36.5% 9.4% 45.7% 64.2% 14.6% 47.1% 2.9%
160 Clevenger, Steve 776 -2 42% 7% 24.7% 10.5% 66.9% 52.9% 31.8% 42.6% 23.1%
161 Lavarnway, Ryan 1,345 -2 44.4% 30.4% 51.3% 16.9% 73.9% 57.4% 35% 36% 10.6%
162 Higgins, P.J. 931 -2 46.2% 16.7% 55% 37.2% 57% 55.4% 29.2% 50.7% 25.3%
163 Davis, Henry pit 1,075 -2 42% 10.8% 42.7% 24.4% 44.1% 67.8% 22.9% 49.6% 22.4%
164 Brantly, Rob 763 -2 42.5% 28.2% 32.2% 23.5% 59.4% 64.2% 15.4% 39% 20.5%
165 Brown, Trevor sf 1,604 -2 44.8% 12.9% 35.8% 3.3% 79.4% 55.4% 31.9% 39.8% 14.9%
166 Gosewisch, Tuffy 2,086 -2 45.6% 8.7% 25.1% 4.9% 67.9% 56.9% 40.6% 49.7% 22.9%
167 Bandy, Jett 3,714 -2 47.1% 11.4% 37.7% 18.8% 68.3% 69.1% 38.4% 43.9% 24.7%
168 Arcia, Francisco ana 777 -2 46.1% 21.6% 50.8% 28.2% 63.9% 68.1% 29.7% 41.9% 17.8%
169 McCann, Kyle oak 1,113 -3 44.9% 13.6% 42.6% 21.3% 55.6% 66% 32.8% 46.3% 22.7%
170 Nicholas, Brett tex 839 -3 39.8% 15.5% 46.2% 24.4% 72.9% 54.7% 13.4% 30.1% 10%
171 Murphy, Tom 7,282 -3 46.4% 18.3% 42.1% 14.3% 63.7% 61.3% 34.4% 53.6% 23.6%
172 Kieboom, Spencer was 1,193 -3 42.9% 16.7% 29% 15% 67.7% 61.9% 35% 42.4% 26.7%
173 Sullivan, Brett sd 880 -3 43.1% 5.3% 44.9% 24.3% 60.3% 55.4% 9.8% 44.4% 34.8%
174 Blair, Carson oak 330 -3 29.4% 5.3% 16.3% 5% 61.4% 37.8% 26.9% 26.7% 6.5%
175 Amaya, Miguel chc 4,532 -3 46.5% 25.8% 50.3% 22.1% 55.4% 63.2% 30.8% 50.3% 23.4%
176 Gimenez, Chris 4,464 -3 45.6% 16.7% 32.6% 16.1% 70.8% 62.7% 35.8% 44.3% 21.4%
177 Bart, Joey 6,293 -3 46.6% 13.8% 45.9% 22.7% 55.5% 68.5% 28.3% 51.5% 27.9%
178 Garneau, Dustin 4,121 -3 44.3% 14.6% 38.1% 18.3% 67.7% 59.3% 33.4% 43.9% 23.1%
179 León, Sandy 12,412 -3 48.6% 23.2% 54.1% 26.3% 67.4% 64.4% 29.7% 45.5% 19.2%
180 Viloria, Meibrys 2,338 -3 47% 24.1% 40.9% 26.2% 63.4% 65% 35.2% 49.4% 21.4%
181 Pérez, Carlos 6,190 -3 45.5% 24.1% 41.1% 17.4% 70.1% 58.5% 29.9% 43.2% 18%
182 Maxwell, Bruce oak 2,991 -3 44.7% 15.1% 34.7% 14.2% 69.9% 58.2% 37.6% 44.3% 23.8%
183 Wynns, Austin 6,098 -4 45.6% 20.9% 50.8% 26.1% 63% 62% 25.8% 42.6% 19%
184 Hicks, John 3,189 -4 46.4% 19.9% 41% 22.1% 67.2% 67.6% 31.9% 40.9% 20.2%
185 Alfaro, Jorge 11,251 -4 47.4% 22.5% 50.2% 24.4% 65.1% 62.3% 29.3% 47.8% 21%
186 Sánchez, Héctor 1,213 -5 39.5% 26.8% 32.9% 13% 67.3% 55.3% 27% 28% 16.7%
187 Peña, Brayan 2,536 -6 43.7% 21.5% 33.6% 15.6% 71.8% 59.3% 36.8% 35% 18.7%
188 Knapp, Andrew 5,982 -6 46.6% 18.4% 45.4% 19.3% 66.3% 61.1% 37.3% 44.9% 22.8%
189 Thaiss, Matt 3,888 -6 43.9% 19.6% 43.6% 18% 55.2% 65.9% 22.9% 48.5% 19.6%
190 Hanigan, Ryan 3,490 -7 44.1% 20.6% 45% 18.7% 69.5% 53.5% 33.5% 43.9% 16%
191 Jeffers, Ryan min 9,148 -7 46.4% 22.1% 50.3% 18.9% 61.3% 61.6% 35.1% 49.6% 21.6%
192 Recker, Anthony 1,489 -7 41.8% 10.3% 29% 8.7% 70.4% 59.7% 23.5% 39.8% 17.2%
193 Swihart, Blake 3,431 -8 43.6% 15.2% 38.9% 19% 63.8% 65.6% 25% 36.8% 23.7%
194 Holaday, Bryan 4,471 -8 44.4% 10.8% 29.4% 12.2% 64.4% 64.1% 32.3% 44.4% 28.2%
195 Smith, Kevan 6,196 -8 45.8% 20% 52.4% 23.7% 68.2% 66.8% 24.9% 36.4% 19.8%
196 O'Hoppe, Logan ana 5,634 -8 43.4% 24.1% 47.3% 18% 60.9% 55.4% 30.7% 45.4% 17.8%
197 Bethancourt, Christian 7,464 -8 46.1% 21.9% 44.6% 22% 71% 59.5% 30.8% 46.5% 17.3%
198 Maile, Luke 10,183 -9 45.3% 19.5% 49.2% 24.3% 64% 65.5% 26.2% 43.3% 21.8%
199 Phegley, Josh 7,385 -9 46.4% 14.8% 32.1% 12.4% 70.5% 59.5% 34.1% 50.1% 26.5%
200 Lee, Korey 3,977 -9 43.5% 19.9% 45.6% 14.5% 59.5% 60.4% 26% 49.2% 19.5%
201 Sánchez, Gary 18,682 -9 47.4% 20.1% 45% 19.8% 65.7% 68.6% 26.8% 46.2% 26.5%
202 Campusano, Luis sd 3,819 -9 44.9% 15.7% 46.9% 22.6% 48.7% 71.3% 23.2% 49.4% 27%
203 Nola, Austin 7,344 -9 47.5% 18.6% 45% 22.2% 58.7% 65.2% 32% 54.6% 27.3%
204 Avila, Alex 9,146 -10 46.1% 16.7% 40.4% 17.1% 68.3% 62.5% 31.5% 44.5% 23.1%
205 Ramos, Wilson 16,583 -10 46.3% 27.6% 52.9% 23.6% 73.3% 60.3% 27.9% 34.6% 14.6%
206 Vogt, Stephen 11,847 -10 46.3% 16.2% 36.7% 19.2% 67.8% 64.7% 30.6% 43% 27.2%
207 Kiner-Falefa, Isiah 2,097 -11 41.8% 16.5% 35.4% 10.7% 64% 52.5% 22.7% 47% 19.4%
208 Stubbs, Garrett 3,868 -11 43.4% 16.4% 37.1% 18.6% 55.4% 57.1% 30.5% 53.8% 21.5%
209 Pérez, Michael 4,677 -11 44.9% 18.7% 52.6% 22.4% 61.8% 60.2% 26.4% 46% 17.8%
210 Saltalamacchia, Jarrod 3,315 -11 43.5% 19.5% 36.9% 19.5% 73.4% 62.2% 25% 31% 18.1%
211 Torrens, Luis 5,163 -11 44.4% 16.9% 43.2% 16.2% 64.2% 59.4% 27.8% 47.8% 19.1%
212 Wong, Connor bos 6,714 -12 45% 12.9% 44.7% 25% 53.2% 69.1% 27.5% 48.8% 19.7%
213 Sisco, Chance 4,036 -12 44.8% 16.1% 37.2% 19.1% 69.4% 58.1% 35.4% 45% 20.9%
214 Melendez, MJ kc 2,308 -12 42.1% 13.1% 38.5% 12.8% 55.2% 59.9% 27.9% 46.5% 21.9%
215 Realmuto, J.T. 34,280 -12 46.8% 16.4% 38.2% 14% 69.4% 59.4% 36.5% 49.7% 23.1%
216 Stallings, Jacob 13,655 -12 46.1% 15.2% 43.1% 19.5% 59.7% 64.6% 31.2% 51% 27.1%
217 Collins, Zack 2,339 -12 41.3% 20.9% 49.2% 17.9% 70.7% 49% 20.6% 36.8% 14.2%
218 Navarro, Dioner 3,734 -12 43.4% 22.9% 42.5% 24.5% 69.8% 64.2% 22.3% 28.3% 13.7%
219 Haase, Eric 6,435 -12 45.5% 16.5% 42.9% 20.2% 61.8% 62.3% 31.4% 49.7% 20.4%
220 Garver, Mitch 8,687 -13 45.7% 15.1% 43.3% 20.6% 62.1% 64.2% 32.3% 47.5% 23.9%
221 Diaz, Yainer hou 4,965 -13 43.3% 18.8% 49.8% 23.5% 58.6% 61.3% 24.3% 42% 20.1%
222 Centeno, Juan 2,581 -13 40.8% 10.7% 29.7% 7.9% 70.1% 51.2% 30.5% 37.3% 15.1%
223 Langeliers, Shea oak 8,484 -13 44% 16.9% 47.7% 22.2% 54.3% 66.1% 22.2% 43.4% 22.3%
224 Stephenson, Tyler cin 9,202 -13 44.7% 21.5% 51.4% 28.9% 58.7% 62% 25% 43.2% 20.7%
225 Herrmann, Chris 4,051 -13 44.6% 14% 37.1% 13.2% 63.9% 65.7% 28.1% 41.3% 25.9%
226 Knizner, Andrew 7,207 -14 44.4% 18.7% 51.8% 27.4% 58.2% 66.2% 27.2% 38.4% 18.8%
227 Mesoraco, Devin 3,594 -15 43.1% 14.5% 32.6% 10.7% 68% 58.3% 28.8% 46% 19%
228 Pierzynski, A.J. 4,826 -15 43.5% 18.2% 36.2% 12.8% 75.9% 56.8% 35.3% 36% 15.1%
229 Ellis, A.J. 5,498 -15 42.5% 19.3% 44.5% 12.3% 72% 58% 25.8% 33.8% 13%
230 Smith, Will la 16,609 -16 46.2% 18.1% 46.2% 20.2% 60.7% 65% 27.2% 51.2% 24.7%
231 Cabrera, Ramón cin 1,539 -16 36.6% 10% 23.8% 10.4% 62.1% 50.5% 43.1% 34.8% 16%
232 Mejía, Francisco 7,119 -17 45.6% 15.3% 45.7% 18.8% 60.1% 63.3% 30.3% 51% 26.1%
233 Castillo, Welington 11,161 -17 45.7% 13% 32.6% 10.2% 66.6% 63% 33.8% 47.2% 25.4%
234 Rupp, Cameron phi 7,791 -18 44.8% 18% 35.6% 15.3% 70.5% 61.3% 27.1% 43.5% 19.7%
235 Adams, Riley was 4,517 -18 42.5% 15% 44.9% 19.6% 59.4% 60.4% 29.4% 43.5% 15.6%
236 Butera, Drew 6,315 -18 43.9% 14.8% 31.9% 9.7% 69% 59.1% 37.7% 45.3% 20%
237 Ruiz, Keibert 11,396 -19 44.2% 22.5% 49.3% 24.1% 62.4% 60.9% 24.8% 42.4% 17.8%
238 Lucroy, Jonathan 15,110 -20 45% 14.7% 32.1% 13.4% 67.3% 60.5% 32.3% 48.8% 24.6%
239 Severino, Pedro 9,015 -21 45.2% 17.9% 42% 17.8% 65.6% 60.1% 32.5% 48.4% 21.7%
240 Contreras, Willson 22,158 -22 46.9% 17.7% 45.5% 21.7% 63% 64.9% 31.4% 46.4% 25.1%
241 Barnhart, Tucker 22,632 -23 46.3% 16% 37% 16.3% 64.8% 62.8% 35% 51% 25.2%
242 Ruiz, Carlos 5,354 -24 42.5% 14.7% 26.8% 11.8% 72% 48.2% 35.2% 45.8% 14.2%
243 Hundley, Nick 10,182 -27 43.7% 16.4% 38.6% 16.3% 66.1% 65.8% 27% 36.4% 19.5%
244 Díaz, Elias 17,903 -32 44.7% 24.9% 50.2% 23.7% 67.1% 55.1% 32.1% 40.5% 15.9%
245 Wieters, Matt 11,901 -33 43.6% 23.7% 38.1% 13.1% 75.2% 53.4% 32.6% 38.7% 14.8%
246 Suzuki, Kurt 17,299 -34 45.8% 18.5% 38.3% 14.4% 67.7% 63.2% 32.8% 43.5% 21.9%
247 McCann, James 23,449 -49 45.8% 20.4% 44.7% 20.4% 64.7% 64.5% 28.6% 45.6% 19.6%
248 Chirinos, Robinson 16,091 -51 44.8% 15% 37.5% 13.7% 64.2% 62.9% 31.1% 47.2% 23.1%
249 Perez, Salvador kc 26,864 -90 44.4% 20.3% 43.6% 18.3% 67.2% 59.7% 31% 41.2% 19.6%