Catcher framing is the art of a catcher receiving a pitch in a way that makes it more likely for an umpire to call it a strike. This page breaks down the catcher’s view into eight zones around the strike zone and shows the called strike percentage of all non-swings in that zone. Strike Rate shows the cumulative total of all zones. Catcher Framing Runs converts strikes to runs saved on a .125 run/strike basis, and includes park and pitcher adjustments. To qualify, a catcher must receive 6 called pitches per team game.
How to say it: “In 2018, Jeff Mathis converted 55 percent of non-swing pitches into called strikes in the Shadow Zone, the best rate of any catcher in baseball.”
Qualifier: For catchers 6 called pitches (i.e., takes, or non-swings) in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. For pitchers and batters 1.5 called pitches in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. (The shadow zone is essentially the edges of the strike zone, roughly one ball width inside and one ball wide outside of the zone. See what that looks like here.)
For pitchers/batters: This shows the framing that occurred behind the plate while the player in question was pitching or hitting.
View: Pitcher
▾
Team
▾
2024
▾
Min Called Pitches: (Q)
▾


Rk. Pitcher Team Pitches
Catcher
Framing
Runs
Strike
Rate
 Zone 11
 Zone 12
 Zone 13
 Zone 14
 Zone 16
 Zone 17
 Zone 18
 Zone 19
Pérez, Martín tex 741 7 56.3% 41.4% 53.7% 13.5% 71.4% 69% 40% 62.3% 31.3%
Bieber, Shane cle 604 6 55.8% 15.2% 47.3% 25% 60.2% 76.8% 56.3% 68.9% 40.2%
Kluber, Corey tb 481 5 55.3% 9.1% 58.7% 29.5% 64.2% 72.3% 66.7% 72.9% 27.8%
Nola, Aaron phi 723 5 53.3% 21.1% 44.4% 27.9% 65.2% 63.7% 36.6% 59.3% 33.8%
Wainwright, Adam stl 725 5 52.6% 24.4% 62.6% 26.7% 65.9% 70.3% 36.7% 48.6% 29.7%
Berríos, José tor 538 5 54.3% 14.3% 45% 10% 75.4% 63.5% 51.3% 59.5% 19.7%
Cole, Gerrit nyy 705 5 54.2% 18.8% 34.3% 19.2% 68% 70.9% 48.9% 66.7% 35.5%
Davies, Zach ari 601 4 50.7% 0% 40.4% 31.7% 57.3% 67.6% 35.8% 55.2% 29.7%
Contreras, Roansy pit 293 4 57% 26.9% 56.7% 23.1% 54.5% 75.8% 50% 61.9% 40%
Chavez, Jesse atl 269 4 58.7% 28.6% 35.7% 0% 68.4% 80% 29.2% 54.2% 48.4%
Kelly, Merrill ari 638 3 50.2% 26.3% 51.4% 20% 59.9% 58.4% 41.2% 55.9% 26%
Stroman, Marcus chc 463 3 51.2% 19% 63.8% 30.8% 50.5% 71.2% 35.3% 53.2% 32.6%
Musgrove, Joe sd 648 3 51.7% 25% 58.3% 38.5% 65% 66.4% 44.4% 54.3% 17.9%
Espino, Paolo was 417 3 52.5% 22.6% 55.9% 23.1% 70.7% 76.4% 46.4% 48.5% 28.6%
Cueto, Johnny cws 439 3 52.2% 42.1% 53.1% 23.3% 73.7% 66.3% 32% 42.3% 19%
Fried, Max atl 521 3 50.5% 40% 44.3% 33.3% 62.8% 61% 31.4% 54.2% 34.6%
Lyles, Jordan bal 562 3 50.9% 30.4% 48.7% 27.6% 70.5% 60.5% 58.7% 54.4% 19.7%
Gray, Sonny min 401 3 53.4% 18.2% 56.9% 25% 55.6% 74.8% 40% 50% 35.1%
Civale, Aaron cle 324 2 51.5% 17.1% 61.5% 25% 70.5% 70.2% 43.8% 53.7% 32.5%
Burke, Brock tex 263 2 55.1% 50% 65.1% 22.2% 68.9% 71.4% 40% 46.3% 33.3%
Burnes, Corbin mil 668 2 50.3% 12.1% 41.7% 20% 51.2% 87.5% 46.5% 56.8% 34.4%
Minor, Mike cin 375 2 50.9% 34.4% 48.1% 24.3% 68.8% 78.9% 16.7% 44% 37.5%
Anderson, Tyler la 506 2 50.8% 25% 44.4% 19.5% 59.5% 70.8% 33.3% 59.8% 38.7%
Williams, Trevor nym 276 2 52.2% 33.3% 40% 25% 59.5% 75% 31.3% 60.9% 27.6%
Morton, Charlie atl 603 2 49.1% 18.4% 38% 0% 70.8% 56.9% 53.7% 62.8% 20.3%
Greinke, Zack kc 476 2 48.7% 39.3% 43.8% 66.7% 65.3% 62.1% 54.2% 43.2% 13.3%
Webb, Logan sf 644 2 49.5% 20% 48.5% 25% 51.4% 71.1% 31.6% 53% 26.7%
Dunning, Dane tex 506 2 52.6% 26.1% 35.7% 33.3% 75.6% 63.2% 50% 51.4% 28.4%
Barlow, Scott kc 244 2 52% 38.5% 61.1% 0% 63.9% 80.6% 18.2% 55% 18.2%
Gray, Jon tex 405 2 51.4% 25.8% 51.2% 15.4% 68.1% 74.3% 40% 51.7% 19.2%
Gausman, Kevin tor 482 2 50.4% 24.3% 44.1% 14.3% 69.8% 59.7% 44.7% 54.6% 24.6%
Blackburn, Paul oak 376 2 51.9% 29.4% 55.6% 11.8% 72.5% 66.3% 37% 43.5% 40.4%
Taillon, Jameson nyy 572 2 50.9% 20% 40.6% 12.5% 71.9% 62.3% 35.2% 58.8% 40.4%
Hill, Rich bos 422 2 51.7% 29.4% 58.5% 32.2% 68.6% 68.3% 15.8% 24.2% 33.3%
Ohtani, Shohei ana 517 1 47.8% 28% 54.2% 18.2% 66.9% 58.5% 23.8% 52.6% 13.2%
Montgomery, Jordan stl 510 1 50.2% 22.7% 42.9% 26.3% 66.2% 77.5% 16.7% 52.5% 27%
Castillo, Luis sea 483 1 49.5% 18.9% 52.4% 10.5% 67.7% 59.8% 36% 58.3% 20.7%
Sánchez, Aníbal was 249 1 50.2% 8.3% 54.1% 58.8% 62.3% 76.6% 28.6% 34.1% 24%
Verlander, Justin hou 571 1 48.2% 30% 62.4% 15.4% 66.1% 68.6% 25% 35.9% 22.7%
Gonzales, Marco sea 588 1 47.6% 14.5% 46.6% 32.4% 57.6% 74% 10.8% 52.9% 41.7%
Phelps, David tor 276 1 48.6% 23.1% 42.9% 17.6% 71.8% 59.7% 60% 56.8% 22.9%
Baker, Bryan bal 261 1 51.3% 15.4% 55.2% 38.5% 51.5% 73.9% 37.5% 52.2% 37.8%
Eovaldi, Nathan bos 347 1 48.7% 11.8% 56.8% 25% 68% 63.8% 44.4% 50.8% 17.3%
Manoah, Alek tor 561 1 48.7% 14% 47.4% 25% 73% 57% 48.6% 54.3% 20.8%
Lugo, Seth nym 267 1 48.3% 9.1% 52.4% 16.7% 57.7% 71.7% 35.3% 49% 28.9%
Bumgarner, Madison ari 529 1 47.1% 20% 38.2% 27.5% 50.8% 77.7% 20.4% 38.8% 44.1%
Martinez, Nick sd 384 1 50.3% 16.1% 51.9% 13.3% 69.9% 65.2% 46.4% 53.2% 26.2%
Cabrera, Edward mia 248 1 52.8% 27.3% 63% 0% 72.5% 56.3% 50% 57.4% 15%
Scherzer, Max nym 395 1 49.6% 20% 65.8% 5.9% 66.2% 66.3% 37.5% 56.3% 16.4%
Garcia, Luis hou 485 1 49.3% 16.1% 54.7% 26.1% 71.4% 63.6% 8.3% 62.2% 25%
Falter, Bailey phi 276 1 51.4% 20% 37.2% 13% 75.6% 75.7% 40.7% 59.5% 25%
Freeland, Kyle col 600 1 46.3% 18.5% 47.7% 16.7% 63.4% 68.3% 25% 39.2% 27.9%
Cortes, Nestor nyy 562 1 49.3% 15.2% 35.8% 12.5% 78.6% 66.9% 27.5% 54.1% 39%
Bundy, Dylan min 404 1 50% 22.2% 60% 25% 64.5% 61.3% 20.8% 61.3% 23.1%
López, Pablo mia 568 1 49.3% 19.4% 44.7% 22.7% 62.6% 62.5% 32.8% 58.9% 30.9%
Kershaw, Clayton la 381 1 49.9% 13.3% 43.5% 25% 69% 68.4% 28.6% 49.5% 54.3%
Kuhl, Chad col 479 1 47.6% 24.4% 52.7% 22.2% 66.4% 54.3% 40.7% 48.1% 19.2%
Giolito, Lucas cws 537 1 48.6% 14.3% 60.4% 39% 59.1% 65.3% 29.4% 45.6% 31%
Skubal, Tarik det 351 1 50.7% 15% 44.2% 23.8% 63.5% 71.4% 17.1% 56.8% 56.3%
Irvin, Cole oak 495 1 47.9% 26.7% 47.3% 29.6% 60% 69.5% 17.6% 49.4% 34.1%
Kaprielian, James oak 437 1 48.7% 40.4% 43.8% 15.8% 67.3% 53% 33.3% 54.7% 26.1%
Quintana, Jose stl 522 1 49% 6.9% 47.8% 41.7% 51.6% 72.8% 11.8% 57.9% 24.5%
Rogers, Tyler sf 264 1 51.9% 66.7% 32.1% 11.1% 85.4% 46.7% 53.8% 65.9% 20%
Montero, Rafael hou 305 0 48.5% 27.3% 50% 8.3% 56.9% 64.2% 42.4% 51.5% 23.8%
Odorizzi, Jake atl 345 0 46.7% 20.6% 47.7% 42.4% 51.2% 64.8% 25% 40% 30.8%
Peralta, Freddy mil 275 0 48.7% 8% 53.6% 40% 64% 60% 41.2% 59.6% 14.3%
Rodón, Carlos sf 591 0 47.9% 5.9% 61.3% 30.6% 57.9% 74.6% 16.3% 42.3% 15%
Velasquez, Vince cws 262 0 46.6% 41.2% 45.8% 25% 72.5% 67.3% 20% 47.6% 16%
Anderson, Ian atl 349 0 45.8% 10% 45.7% 29.6% 65.9% 65.8% 41.4% 44.9% 18.4%
Crowe, Wil pit 261 0 47.1% 14.3% 40% 0% 46.3% 75% 60% 57.5% 15.8%
Severino, Luis nyy 360 0 47.8% 0% 42.3% 17.6% 60.8% 62.2% 50% 63.9% 27.7%
Gray, Josiah was 511 0 47.6% 18.4% 50% 18.2% 70.8% 66% 40.6% 41.5% 12.3%
White, Mitch tor 297 0 49.2% 32.1% 47.8% 25% 59.2% 69.8% 25% 60% 11.5%
Pivetta, Nick bos 607 0 47% 33.3% 60% 22.9% 63.2% 62% 25% 41.4% 19%
Fedde, Erick was 554 0 46.6% 27.3% 60.4% 18.8% 61.2% 54.1% 25% 51.5% 10.3%
Feltner, Ryan col 370 0 46.5% 20% 56.1% 28.6% 64.1% 60.8% 25% 47.2% 19%
Carrasco, Carlos nym 423 0 48% 22.7% 46.8% 20% 48.9% 78.9% 33.3% 52.6% 30.4%
Whitlock, Garrett bos 245 0 48.6% 0% 33.3% 21.4% 60.9% 69.6% 22.2% 55.3% 34.3%
Otto, Glenn tex 424 0 48.6% 27.3% 54.3% 41.7% 63.1% 61.2% 50% 49.5% 18.6%
Cobb, Alex sf 523 0 47.2% 7.1% 50% 30.8% 59.3% 60.3% 41.4% 41.8% 26.3%
Gallen, Zac ari 618 0 46.1% 25.8% 45.1% 6.3% 78.6% 51.6% 52.2% 41.5% 13.6%
Brubaker, JT pit 515 0 47.2% 22.4% 47.7% 29.6% 50% 58.9% 53.3% 61.8% 20.8%
Singer, Brady kc 538 0 46.5% 14.7% 55.8% 16.7% 48.1% 65.5% 45.5% 47.5% 26.4%
Syndergaard, Noah phi 425 0 48% 32.6% 46.9% 41.2% 60% 71.6% 24.1% 50.6% 20.8%
Garrett, Braxton mia 278 0 48.6% 33.3% 60% 52.6% 41.5% 73.6% 18.8% 48.1% 31.3%
Houser, Adrian mil 423 0 48% 7.7% 32.5% 23.5% 57.4% 71.1% 34.3% 54.4% 24.5%
Hearn, Taylor tex 357 0 47.9% 26.1% 63.8% 14.3% 48.6% 74.6% 37.8% 45.2% 27.8%
Smyly, Drew chc 303 0 44.6% 15% 63.9% 31.8% 56.1% 65.2% 27.3% 34.9% 11.8%
Mahle, Tyler min 481 0 47.2% 17.6% 41.7% 36.8% 66.2% 58.4% 57.7% 51.3% 20%
Ray, Robbie sea 505 0 46.3% 25% 37.3% 9.8% 61.1% 67.9% 20% 50.6% 50%
Suárez, Ranger phi 611 0 48.6% 8.3% 39.4% 17.6% 64.9% 75.3% 26.8% 52.2% 32.6%
Thompson, Zach pit 425 0 47.1% 29.7% 48.6% 37.5% 58.8% 62.5% 21.1% 52.4% 24%
Winckowski, Josh bos 260 0 46.9% 21.7% 54.5% 50% 61.9% 68.6% 0% 34.8% 17.2%
Quantrill, Cal cle 574 0 47% 21% 48.3% 37.9% 65.1% 73.3% 32% 43.5% 18%
Sampson, Adrian chc 335 0 46% 13.6% 52.3% 11.8% 75% 43.5% 42.3% 45.7% 32.4%
Gonsolin, Tony la 383 0 47.8% 7.4% 28.6% 21.4% 64.6% 78.4% 35.7% 58.9% 22.9%
Hendricks, Kyle chc 283 0 47.3% 22.2% 66.7% 26.1% 69.2% 48.8% 48% 41.2% 26.5%
Kopech, Michael cws 386 0 46.6% 30.6% 41.1% 15.4% 66% 64.6% 14.3% 55.1% 17.4%
Ryan, Joe min 473 0 48.4% 31.5% 43.7% 22.6% 66.7% 59% 25% 63.1% 24.5%
Alexander, Tyler det 322 0 46.9% 9.1% 38.2% 17.6% 47.5% 81.7% 27.3% 45.5% 35.5%
Plesac, Zach cle 390 -1 45.1% 15% 52.4% 38.1% 53.3% 69.6% 30.8% 36.7% 29.6%
Junis, Jakob sf 372 -1 45.4% 8.1% 65.6% 0% 51.8% 65.5% 29.2% 50% 27.3%
Voth, Austin bal 352 -1 43.8% 22.6% 56.1% 20% 63.4% 50% 50% 45.7% 15.4%
Corbin, Patrick was 537 -1 45.4% 34.5% 47.9% 16% 60% 63.2% 23.8% 43.6% 21.2%
Crawford, Kutter bos 250 -1 42.8% 15% 69.2% 29.4% 63.9% 47.1% 15.4% 51.9% 14.3%
Peterson, David nym 374 -1 45.7% 0% 55.4% 31.7% 54.5% 65.9% 24% 40.8% 26.1%
McClanahan, Shane tb 506 -1 46.6% 41.2% 49.3% 21.4% 63.8% 57.5% 32.8% 49.6% 22.2%
Scott, Tanner mia 247 -1 46.2% 9.1% 50% 16.7% 63.5% 72% 26.2% 46.3% 28.6%
Ureña, José col 307 -1 45.6% 36.4% 61.5% 10% 67.3% 57.4% 39.3% 38.7% 17.5%
Gore, MacKenzie sd 247 -1 44.9% 5.9% 36.4% 12% 56.6% 68.1% 21.1% 58.5% 41.7%
Eflin, Zach phi 320 -1 46.9% 6.3% 23.8% 0% 76.4% 59.1% 45.8% 48.8% 24.5%
Lynn, Lance cws 342 -1 45% 29% 49.1% 12.5% 82.3% 40.8% 22.2% 46% 22.2%
Mikolas, Miles stl 705 -1 45.4% 15% 59.6% 45.5% 67.1% 60% 16.7% 35% 17.9%
Wacha, Michael bos 395 -1 44.6% 25.7% 62.7% 40% 58.3% 57.8% 39.3% 27.5% 29.5%
Walker, Taijuan nym 483 -1 46.8% 30% 51.6% 27.3% 53% 65.8% 37.5% 47.7% 20.6%
Watkins, Spenser bal 331 -1 45.6% 12.8% 36.5% 10% 71.6% 58.1% 38.5% 58.6% 21.4%
Urquidy, José hou 499 -1 46.5% 30% 47.5% 31.6% 75% 59.4% 83.3% 45.9% 21.4%
Ashby, Aaron mil 374 -1 46.8% 0% 51.9% 22.9% 60% 66.7% 20.6% 51.2% 26.1%
Akin, Keegan bal 256 -1 44.5% 16.7% 41.7% 30% 56.3% 55.8% 22.9% 58.1% 17.9%
Wells, Tyler bal 327 -1 45% 20% 52% 20% 61.1% 57.1% 50% 53.3% 22%
Stripling, Ross tor 401 -1 44.4% 20.5% 61.7% 10% 63.2% 60.6% 26.9% 44.3% 8.3%
Flexen, Chris sea 404 -1 44.6% 24.4% 51.6% 28.9% 65% 64.3% 22.6% 45.5% 23.4%
Bassitt, Chris nym 626 -1 47.1% 23.3% 47.6% 33.3% 45.9% 62.7% 25% 61.1% 30.5%
Thompson, Keegan chc 386 -1 43.8% 19% 47.4% 12.5% 63.8% 61.2% 40% 38.5% 18.6%
Wood, Alex sf 460 -1 45.7% 2.9% 51.2% 19.2% 59.2% 66.7% 16.7% 53.3% 26.1%
Kirby, George sea 456 -1 44.5% 19% 54.1% 21.9% 62.3% 62.7% 23.1% 40.7% 16.9%
Gilbert, Logan sea 561 -1 44.9% 22.8% 46.5% 32% 63.6% 61% 23.1% 37.8% 22%
Wheeler, Zack phi 545 -1 46.8% 16.7% 38.3% 23.3% 63.6% 57.9% 56.3% 56.5% 18.6%
Gomber, Austin col 421 -1 45.1% 35% 45.2% 34.4% 62.3% 74.6% 19.4% 38.1% 32%
Yarbrough, Ryan tb 257 -1 44.7% 6.7% 48.8% 21.7% 45.3% 70.6% 11.8% 54.3% 18.2%
Lauer, Eric mil 569 -1 46% 28.6% 49.3% 14.9% 57.9% 69.4% 19.4% 51.6% 33.3%
Lodolo, Nick cin 354 -1 43.8% 20% 64.8% 31.3% 44.6% 73% 9.1% 33.9% 0%
Wilson, Bryse pit 394 -1 44.7% 26.5% 44.7% 6.7% 61.5% 64.3% 40% 44.3% 20%
Kimbrel, Craig la 249 -1 44.2% 11.8% 33.3% 0% 76.2% 52.8% 66.7% 64.7% 22%
Pallante, Andre stl 402 -1 43.3% 24% 48.4% 9.1% 62.7% 62.9% 25% 39.2% 12.8%
Suarez, José ana 350 -1 42.9% 9.1% 35.9% 12.1% 55.4% 67.2% 21.3% 47.3% 25%
Gibson, Kyle phi 552 -1 46% 25% 41.7% 40% 61.2% 62% 25.9% 49.1% 20%
Diekman, Jake cws 248 -1 44.4% 20% 55.2% 16.7% 42.4% 65.9% 28.3% 54.8% 25%
Luzardo, Jesús mia 366 -1 47.3% 18.2% 47.4% 18.2% 55.6% 72.1% 31.1% 60.7% 19.4%
Cease, Dylan cws 534 -1 46.8% 18.2% 55.4% 22.2% 63.5% 63.8% 57.1% 48.1% 19.7%
Brieske, Beau det 267 -1 42.7% 7.7% 14.3% 0% 59.6% 59.1% 26.1% 54.2% 22.9%
Urías, Julio la 506 -1 46.6% 23.8% 44.3% 13.7% 63.2% 70.8% 16.4% 55.4% 27.6%
Springs, Jeffrey tb 410 -1 45.1% 8.3% 40.3% 15.9% 54% 72.9% 31% 53.5% 31.8%
Cessa, Luis cin 272 -1 44.1% 22.2% 46.2% 28.6% 62.5% 71.7% 35.7% 39.7% 18.8%
McKenzie, Triston cle 520 -2 43.1% 26.8% 39.5% 3.6% 75.3% 62.2% 20.7% 41.1% 20.8%
Montas, Frankie nyy 421 -2 43.7% 11.1% 35.9% 16.7% 50.5% 71.2% 38.5% 43% 32.8%
Manaea, Sean sd 496 -2 43.3% 5.9% 35.1% 25.4% 35.2% 80.2% 7.5% 44% 29.4%
Smith, Caleb ari 248 -2 40.7% 14.8% 57.6% 14.8% 55.9% 60% 12.5% 36.8% 60%
Lorenzen, Michael ana 304 -2 41.8% 15.2% 37.1% 30% 65.4% 46.8% 33.3% 56.8% 7.9%
Zimmermann, Bruce bal 244 -2 39.3% 22.2% 36.6% 4.3% 62.2% 59.6% 14.3% 44.4% 35.7%
Ashcraft, Graham cin 341 -2 42.2% 10.8% 41.3% 25% 58.6% 71.4% 45% 46.6% 10%
Adon, Joan was 269 -2 39.8% 4.3% 43.8% 50% 73.3% 47.5% 41.7% 50% 6.7%
Hutchison, Drew det 342 -2 43.6% 18.5% 42.5% 20% 79.7% 50% 29.4% 40.6% 20.5%
Snell, Blake sd 510 -2 45.5% 17.9% 45% 38.6% 54.7% 67.3% 26.8% 37.3% 35.9%
Heaney, Andrew la 285 -2 42.8% 21.7% 32.6% 5.3% 48.1% 68.6% 20% 65.3% 33.3%
Coleman, Dylan kc 247 -2 40.5% 13.3% 58.6% 11.1% 69% 31.4% 28.6% 35.3% 14.8%
Senzatela, Antonio col 320 -2 42.2% 25% 51.7% 15.4% 61.5% 36.2% 47.6% 49.1% 13.2%
Detmers, Reid ana 406 -2 43.3% 23.1% 48.9% 13.1% 61% 60.4% 26.3% 50% 30%
Márquez, Germán col 544 -2 43.2% 18.2% 53.5% 50% 56.5% 53.9% 21.6% 53.7% 18.5%
Rodriguez, Eduardo det 323 -2 43.7% 16.7% 28.6% 7.1% 63.6% 64.8% 35.6% 38.6% 21.7%
Rasmussen, Drew tb 398 -2 43.5% 21.4% 37.7% 7.7% 62.1% 63.5% 52.2% 48.1% 9.1%
Sandoval, Patrick ana 476 -2 42.4% 12% 45.7% 16.7% 63.5% 48.3% 21.7% 56.5% 22.2%
Alcantara, Sandy mia 650 -2 45.5% 16% 46.6% 31.3% 62.6% 48.6% 44.4% 54.7% 18%
Wright, Kyle atl 522 -2 44.1% 17.5% 45.6% 23.1% 60.3% 56.1% 35% 50.5% 12.3%
Woodruff, Brandon mil 522 -2 45.2% 17.2% 35.6% 9.1% 62.4% 60.6% 27.3% 54.7% 27.5%
Strider, Spencer atl 428 -2 42.8% 20% 36.7% 22.2% 64.1% 51.2% 40% 44.8% 23.1%
Clevinger, Mike sd 397 -2 44.3% 21.1% 43.1% 38.1% 57.3% 60.2% 15.8% 46.3% 11.6%
Keller, Mitch pit 576 -3 42.2% 18.6% 39% 16.7% 61.5% 55.7% 40% 50.8% 9.4%
Archer, Chris min 373 -3 41% 15.8% 42.4% 29.6% 70.9% 54.2% 35% 36.1% 23.4%
Kremer, Dean bal 371 -3 41% 13.5% 42.2% 27.3% 62.1% 51.4% 66.7% 48% 13.1%
Heasley, Jonathan kc 417 -3 40.5% 7.7% 38.8% 18.8% 55.2% 60.9% 27.6% 40.9% 11.1%
Javier, Cristian hou 496 -3 41.9% 20.9% 51.9% 28.6% 57.1% 55.8% 31.8% 40.7% 20%
Bradish, Kyle bal 414 -4 40.1% 13% 40.5% 37.5% 63.9% 53.8% 32% 47.1% 15.6%
Steele, Justin chc 423 -4 38.1% 30% 56.2% 18% 53.8% 51.6% 9.3% 36.2% 4.5%
Hudson, Dakota stl 509 -4 39.7% 16.7% 50% 35.7% 40% 74.2% 12.5% 44.6% 18.8%
Keller, Brad kc 437 -4 39.6% 18% 53.7% 5.9% 58.6% 53.8% 14.3% 39.2% 18.2%
Greene, Hunter cin 433 -4 39.3% 16.7% 43.1% 10.5% 60% 52.2% 48.1% 42.6% 17.3%
Valdez, Framber hou 730 -4 43.7% 37.9% 50.5% 14.9% 68.5% 36.3% 22.8% 47.9% 12.5%
Darvish, Yu sd 687 -4 44.5% 12.8% 44.6% 29.4% 59.7% 62.4% 30.6% 40.9% 24.4%
Lynch IV, Daniel kc 433 -4 39% 10% 43.3% 10.5% 57% 59.8% 11.9% 37.3% 23.3%
Rogers, Trevor mia 415 -4 40.7% 15.4% 32.6% 3.8% 58.3% 43.3% 18.2% 52.5% 34.8%
Bubic, Kris kc 492 -4 39.8% 16.7% 43.8% 14.8% 60.9% 61.1% 16.3% 37.5% 23.1%
Kikuchi, Yusei tor 361 -5 35.5% 0% 32.1% 0% 43.3% 47.5% 25.5% 50.6% 25%