Catcher framing is the art of a catcher receiving a pitch in a way that makes it more likely for an umpire to call it a strike. This page breaks down the catcher’s view into eight zones around the strike zone and shows the called strike percentage of all non-swings in that zone. Strike Rate shows the cumulative total of all zones. Catcher Framing Runs converts strikes to runs saved on a .125 run/strike basis, and includes park and pitcher adjustments. To qualify, a catcher must receive 6 called pitches per team game.
How to say it: “In 2018, Jeff Mathis converted 55 percent of non-swing pitches into called strikes in the Shadow Zone, the best rate of any catcher in baseball.”
Qualifier: For catchers 6 called pitches (i.e., takes, or non-swings) in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. For pitchers and batters 1.5 called pitches in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. (The shadow zone is essentially the edges of the strike zone, roughly one ball width inside and one ball wide outside of the zone. See what that looks like here.)
For pitchers/batters: This shows the framing that occurred behind the plate while the player in question was pitching or hitting.

This archival leaderboard is no longer supported, as it relies on an old framing model, and only shows season-level data from 2015-17. For more robust data from 2018-present using the new framing model, find the updated version of our Catcher Framing Leaderboard at this link.

View: Catcher
▾
Team
▾
2016
▾
Min Called Pitches: Qualified
▾


Rk. Catcher Team Pitches
Catcher
Framing
Runs
Strike
Rate
 Zone 11
 Zone 12
 Zone 13
 Zone 14
 Zone 16
 Zone 17
 Zone 18
 Zone 19
Posey, Buster sf 3,489 31 53.2% 27.1% 43.7% 13.9% 80.1% 68.7% 38.7% 50.5% 24.7%
Grandal, Yasmani la 3,304 28 52.8% 28.8% 48.9% 23% 74.6% 71.8% 31.1% 47.4% 29.7%
Cervelli, Francisco pit 2,734 14 49.7% 15.6% 21.2% 2.9% 71.9% 56.5% 51.6% 57.7% 27.3%
Martin, Russell tor 3,723 14 48% 18.2% 38% 14.9% 79.9% 59.5% 43.1% 46.8% 18.4%
Castro, Jason hou 3,119 12 49% 22.7% 41.7% 18.3% 72.8% 68.3% 35.3% 43.3% 23.6%
Molina, Yadier stl 4,092 11 47% 19.5% 46.5% 11.8% 71.6% 61.7% 33.4% 44% 22%
Flowers, Tyler atl 2,249 9 50.5% 9.8% 29.8% 7.9% 76.3% 58.7% 49.4% 62.7% 29.3%
Pérez, Roberto cle 1,822 9 50.4% 23.3% 54.6% 20.2% 77% 66.7% 30.9% 40.5% 19.3%
Montero, Miguel chc 1,915 9 50.6% 17.2% 39.8% 18% 75.6% 60.8% 36.9% 54.9% 33.2%
d'Arnaud, Travis nym 2,101 8 51.4% 28.7% 39.7% 16.3% 76.8% 65.6% 38% 52% 26.4%
Wolters, Tony col 1,583 7 49.5% 15.7% 25.7% 10.9% 79.4% 58.9% 44.9% 58.5% 29.5%
Norris, Derek sd 3,438 7 46.7% 17.6% 37.8% 14.8% 80.1% 56.5% 42.9% 43.6% 18.2%
Rivera, René nym 1,572 6 50.1% 22.4% 40.8% 14.5% 72.8% 70.8% 40.5% 42.8% 25.9%
Mathis, Jeff mia 1,050 5 53.1% 14% 29.8% 8.3% 70.1% 66.5% 44.2% 58.1% 45.9%
Lobatón, Jose was 1,011 4 51.5% 20.9% 31.8% 1.8% 77.5% 59% 54.1% 59% 31.4%
Casali, Curt tb 1,943 4 45.2% 30% 36.3% 16.3% 87.1% 54.5% 30.6% 36.7% 12%
Vázquez, Christian bos 1,465 4 48.1% 21.7% 32.2% 23.5% 71% 67.2% 31% 51.5% 25%
Maldonado, Martín mil 1,940 4 48.8% 19.1% 34% 7.3% 78.8% 57.1% 49.4% 51.7% 23.4%
Joseph, Caleb bal 1,247 3 47.1% 36.8% 47.6% 10.6% 80.5% 48% 34.2% 45.3% 15.4%
Zunino, Mike sea 1,407 3 48.3% 10.5% 36.4% 20% 67.6% 59.4% 39.3% 52.6% 28.1%
Ross, David chc 1,534 3 50% 15.3% 37.7% 5.3% 68.8% 71.8% 36.8% 44.1% 34.1%
Plawecki, Kevin nym 1,138 2 49% 17.1% 44.7% 6.5% 76.7% 63.4% 37.2% 56.3% 16.5%
Thole, Josh tor 1,127 1 41.8% 18.7% 46.7% 17% 77.4% 54% 23.9% 34.5% 6.1%
Pérez, Carlos ana 2,287 1 47.4% 26.8% 43.7% 14.6% 73% 61.8% 30.4% 40.9% 19.7%
Ellis, A.J. phi 1,531 1 44.8% 21.2% 40% 10.6% 78.6% 58.6% 31.9% 36% 16%
Gattis, Evan hou 1,477 1 49.8% 19.8% 50.3% 16.7% 76.5% 68.2% 32.3% 46.8% 17.2%
Suzuki, Kurt min 2,829 1 46.9% 19.8% 45.1% 17.5% 73.6% 61.7% 31.9% 36.8% 17.8%
Bethancourt, Christian sd 1,109 1 46.9% 27.1% 37.9% 17.4% 79.4% 59.4% 36.3% 37.1% 23.3%
Ramos, Wilson was 3,544 1 45.6% 33.7% 52.7% 10.7% 82.2% 52% 34% 33.5% 11.4%
Contreras, Willson chc 1,671 1 48.1% 12.2% 32% 8.2% 72.1% 59.5% 45.5% 52.9% 30%
Castillo, Welington ari 3,238 1 47.1% 13.2% 27% 6.5% 70.2% 57.5% 36.9% 48.8% 24.6%
Fryer, Eric pit 1,026 0 45.6% 18.4% 23.8% 4.2% 75.6% 51.2% 34.8% 50.9% 25%
Gomes, Yan cle 1,941 0 44.3% 26.6% 33.8% 13% 81.9% 46.8% 39.4% 38.9% 20.4%
Butera, Drew kc 1,083 0 46.3% 17.1% 20.5% 12.2% 75.7% 61.1% 40% 51% 17.3%
McCann, Brian nyy 2,514 0 47.8% 11.7% 24.9% 5.7% 75.9% 53.9% 49% 51.9% 23.4%
Sánchez, Gary nyy 1,037 0 48.4% 12.7% 43.8% 6.4% 75.5% 64% 35.3% 40.6% 19.3%
Romine, Austin nyy 1,204 -1 46.3% 15.9% 33.8% 8% 82.4% 51.2% 49.5% 40.9% 13.3%
Brown, Trevor sf 1,247 -1 44% 14% 33.3% 2.2% 79.4% 56% 27% 39.7% 15.4%
Maile, Luke tb 1,031 -2 42.2% 22.9% 42.6% 12.7% 79.1% 53.7% 24.1% 35% 14%
Conger, Hank tb 1,120 -2 43.9% 18.8% 41.6% 13.4% 75.4% 57.1% 32.9% 40.5% 19.4%
Gimenez, Chris cle 1,304 -2 44.9% 11.6% 31.4% 12.1% 77.8% 58.7% 37.8% 44.4% 18.8%
Bandy, Jett ana 1,733 -2 45.3% 11.3% 42.6% 24.2% 67.8% 70.1% 29.4% 39.6% 19.8%
Wilson, Bobby tb 2,082 -2 44.5% 19% 34.3% 8.8% 78.7% 54.5% 26.9% 46.5% 18.5%
Rupp, Cameron phi 3,102 -2 46.3% 19.7% 36.3% 13.4% 70.6% 56.9% 33.9% 49.3% 21.9%
McCann, James det 2,654 -3 46.1% 31% 43.6% 23% 78.7% 61.3% 32.8% 31% 13.2%
Barnhart, Tucker cin 3,303 -4 44.7% 13.2% 18.5% 7.1% 71.5% 56.3% 40.2% 52.7% 25.2%
Lucroy, Jonathan tex 3,758 -5 44.1% 13.8% 29.3% 6% 73.2% 52.1% 34% 48.6% 21.7%
Avila, Alex cws 1,477 -5 41.6% 12.9% 28.7% 17.1% 69.6% 59.9% 24.6% 33.3% 18.8%
Hanigan, Ryan bos 995 -5 40.2% 19.1% 46% 22.2% 72.5% 46.6% 20.7% 34.4% 7.2%
Holaday, Bryan bos 1,060 -6 39.8% 7.1% 29.8% 5.9% 74.9% 50.2% 29% 33.6% 26.2%
Saltalamacchia, Jarrod det 1,804 -6 42.8% 22.9% 40.4% 22.4% 73.8% 61.7% 22.7% 23.4% 14.2%
Chirinos, Robinson tex 1,416 -6 40.6% 18.3% 35.2% 12.2% 69.3% 56.9% 22.4% 36.8% 16.8%
León, Sandy bos 2,023 -7 44.6% 22.6% 52.1% 23.2% 73.8% 58% 21.6% 33% 12.8%
Hundley, Nick col 2,239 -7 42.5% 17.5% 32.3% 12.8% 70.4% 60.6% 30.2% 37% 18.2%
Pierzynski, A.J. atl 1,840 -8 41.7% 13.2% 30.6% 9.8% 73.1% 55.8% 31.5% 41.1% 14.2%
Ruiz, Carlos la 1,743 -8 42.6% 16.9% 28.4% 8.2% 78.5% 43.2% 36.7% 42.4% 13.1%
Wieters, Matt bal 3,508 -10 43% 26.9% 35.9% 10.2% 83.4% 48.6% 36.6% 34.3% 11.5%
Navarro, Dioner tor 2,669 -10 43.4% 22.5% 43.2% 26.6% 66.8% 66.5% 18.8% 28.4% 13.3%
Centeno, Juan min 1,468 -10 40.5% 10.9% 30.6% 6% 75.1% 47.4% 27.5% 32.1% 9.2%
Realmuto, J.T. mia 3,827 -11 44.9% 14.7% 27.7% 4.5% 74.8% 51.2% 36.8% 46.1% 19.3%
Vogt, Stephen oak 3,085 -12 43.9% 15.3% 38.7% 13.5% 74% 57.8% 27.8% 36.5% 20.7%
Iannetta, Chris sea 2,721 -14 42% 13.6% 34.8% 8.3% 69.4% 56.4% 24.1% 39.2% 20.2%
Cabrera, Ramón cin 1,382 -16 35.8% 8.5% 20.7% 10.4% 62.6% 50% 42% 34.1% 15.6%
Perez, Salvador kc 3,860 -17 42.7% 20.8% 41.8% 17.3% 72.7% 57.5% 24.8% 32.8% 14.7%