Catcher framing is the art of a catcher receiving a pitch in a way that makes it more likely for an umpire to call it a strike. This page breaks down the catcher’s view into eight zones around the strike zone and shows the called strike percentage of all non-swings in that zone. Strike Rate shows the cumulative total of all zones. Catcher Framing Runs converts strikes to runs saved on a .125 run/strike basis, and includes park and pitcher adjustments. To qualify, a catcher must receive 6 called pitches per team game.
How to say it: “In 2018, Jeff Mathis converted 55 percent of non-swing pitches into called strikes in the Shadow Zone, the best rate of any catcher in baseball.”
Qualifier: For catchers 6 called pitches (i.e., takes, or non-swings) in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. For pitchers and batters 1.5 called pitches in the ‘shadow zone’ per team game. (The shadow zone is essentially the edges of the strike zone, roughly one ball width inside and one ball wide outside of the zone. See what that looks like here.)
For pitchers/batters: This shows the framing that occurred behind the plate while the player in question was pitching or hitting.
View: Pitcher
▾
Team
▾
2024
▾
Min Called Pitches: (Q)
▾


Rk. Pitcher Team Pitches
Catcher
Framing
Runs
Strike
Rate
 Zone 11
 Zone 12
 Zone 13
 Zone 14
 Zone 16
 Zone 17
 Zone 18
 Zone 19
Pérez, Martín tex 741 7 56.3% 41.4% 53.7% 13.5% 71.4% 69% 40% 62.3% 31.3%
Bieber, Shane cle 604 6 55.8% 15.2% 47.3% 25% 60.2% 76.8% 56.3% 68.9% 40.2%
Berríos, José tor 538 5 54.3% 14.3% 45% 10% 75.4% 63.5% 51.3% 59.5% 19.7%
Cole, Gerrit nyy 705 5 54.2% 18.8% 34.3% 19.2% 68% 70.9% 48.9% 66.7% 35.5%
Wainwright, Adam stl 725 5 52.6% 24.4% 62.6% 26.7% 65.9% 70.3% 36.7% 48.6% 29.7%
Nola, Aaron phi 723 5 53.3% 21.1% 44.4% 27.9% 65.2% 63.7% 36.6% 59.3% 33.8%
Kluber, Corey tb 481 5 55.3% 9.1% 58.7% 29.5% 64.2% 72.3% 66.7% 72.9% 27.8%
Contreras, Roansy pit 293 4 57% 26.9% 56.7% 23.1% 54.5% 75.8% 50% 61.9% 40%
Chavez, Jesse atl 269 4 58.7% 28.6% 35.7% 0% 68.4% 80% 29.2% 54.2% 48.4%
Davies, Zach ari 601 4 50.7% 0% 40.4% 31.7% 57.3% 67.6% 35.8% 55.2% 29.7%
Lyles, Jordan bal 562 3 50.9% 30.4% 48.7% 27.6% 70.5% 60.5% 58.7% 54.4% 19.7%
Gray, Sonny min 401 3 53.4% 18.2% 56.9% 25% 55.6% 74.8% 40% 50% 35.1%
Espino, Paolo was 417 3 52.5% 22.6% 55.9% 23.1% 70.7% 76.4% 46.4% 48.5% 28.6%
Kelly, Merrill ari 638 3 50.2% 26.3% 51.4% 20% 59.9% 58.4% 41.2% 55.9% 26%
Fried, Max atl 521 3 50.5% 40% 44.3% 33.3% 62.8% 61% 31.4% 54.2% 34.6%
Stroman, Marcus chc 463 3 51.2% 19% 63.8% 30.8% 50.5% 71.2% 35.3% 53.2% 32.6%
Cueto, Johnny cws 439 3 52.2% 42.1% 53.1% 23.3% 73.7% 66.3% 32% 42.3% 19%
Musgrove, Joe sd 648 3 51.7% 25% 58.3% 38.5% 65% 66.4% 44.4% 54.3% 17.9%
Taillon, Jameson nyy 572 2 50.9% 20% 40.6% 12.5% 71.9% 62.3% 35.2% 58.8% 40.4%
Barlow, Scott kc 244 2 52% 38.5% 61.1% 0% 63.9% 80.6% 18.2% 55% 18.2%
Gausman, Kevin tor 482 2 50.4% 24.3% 44.1% 14.3% 69.8% 59.7% 44.7% 54.6% 24.6%
Civale, Aaron cle 324 2 51.5% 17.1% 61.5% 25% 70.5% 70.2% 43.8% 53.7% 32.5%
Burnes, Corbin mil 668 2 50.3% 12.1% 41.7% 20% 51.2% 87.5% 46.5% 56.8% 34.4%
Burke, Brock tex 263 2 55.1% 50% 65.1% 22.2% 68.9% 71.4% 40% 46.3% 33.3%
Gray, Jon tex 405 2 51.4% 25.8% 51.2% 15.4% 68.1% 74.3% 40% 51.7% 19.2%
Webb, Logan sf 644 2 49.5% 20% 48.5% 25% 51.4% 71.1% 31.6% 53% 26.7%
Williams, Trevor nym 276 2 52.2% 33.3% 40% 25% 59.5% 75% 31.3% 60.9% 27.6%
Blackburn, Paul oak 376 2 51.9% 29.4% 55.6% 11.8% 72.5% 66.3% 37% 43.5% 40.4%
Morton, Charlie atl 603 2 49.1% 18.4% 38% 0% 70.8% 56.9% 53.7% 62.8% 20.3%
Minor, Mike cin 375 2 50.9% 34.4% 48.1% 24.3% 68.8% 78.9% 16.7% 44% 37.5%
Greinke, Zack kc 476 2 48.7% 39.3% 43.8% 66.7% 65.3% 62.1% 54.2% 43.2% 13.3%
Anderson, Tyler la 506 2 50.8% 25% 44.4% 19.5% 59.5% 70.8% 33.3% 59.8% 38.7%
Dunning, Dane tex 506 2 52.6% 26.1% 35.7% 33.3% 75.6% 63.2% 50% 51.4% 28.4%
Hill, Rich bos 422 2 51.7% 29.4% 58.5% 32.2% 68.6% 68.3% 15.8% 24.2% 33.3%
Bumgarner, Madison ari 529 1 47.1% 20% 38.2% 27.5% 50.8% 77.7% 20.4% 38.8% 44.1%
Cabrera, Edward mia 248 1 52.8% 27.3% 63% 0% 72.5% 56.3% 50% 57.4% 15%
Cortes, Nestor nyy 562 1 49.3% 15.2% 35.8% 12.5% 78.6% 66.9% 27.5% 54.1% 39%
Verlander, Justin hou 571 1 48.2% 30% 62.4% 15.4% 66.1% 68.6% 25% 35.9% 22.7%
Martinez, Nick sd 384 1 50.3% 16.1% 51.9% 13.3% 69.9% 65.2% 46.4% 53.2% 26.2%
Castillo, Luis sea 483 1 49.5% 18.9% 52.4% 10.5% 67.7% 59.8% 36% 58.3% 20.7%
Irvin, Cole oak 495 1 47.9% 26.7% 47.3% 29.6% 60% 69.5% 17.6% 49.4% 34.1%
Kaprielian, James oak 437 1 48.7% 40.4% 43.8% 15.8% 67.3% 53% 33.3% 54.7% 26.1%
Sánchez, Aníbal was 249 1 50.2% 8.3% 54.1% 58.8% 62.3% 76.6% 28.6% 34.1% 24%
Gonzales, Marco sea 588 1 47.6% 14.5% 46.6% 32.4% 57.6% 74% 10.8% 52.9% 41.7%
Bundy, Dylan min 404 1 50% 22.2% 60% 25% 64.5% 61.3% 20.8% 61.3% 23.1%
Freeland, Kyle col 600 1 46.3% 18.5% 47.7% 16.7% 63.4% 68.3% 25% 39.2% 27.9%
Garcia, Luis hou 485 1 49.3% 16.1% 54.7% 26.1% 71.4% 63.6% 8.3% 62.2% 25%
Quintana, Jose stl 522 1 49% 6.9% 47.8% 41.7% 51.6% 72.8% 11.8% 57.9% 24.5%
Phelps, David tor 276 1 48.6% 23.1% 42.9% 17.6% 71.8% 59.7% 60% 56.8% 22.9%
Skubal, Tarik det 351 1 50.7% 15% 44.2% 23.8% 63.5% 71.4% 17.1% 56.8% 56.3%
Kuhl, Chad col 479 1 47.6% 24.4% 52.7% 22.2% 66.4% 54.3% 40.7% 48.1% 19.2%
López, Pablo mia 568 1 49.3% 19.4% 44.7% 22.7% 62.6% 62.5% 32.8% 58.9% 30.9%
Ohtani, Shohei ana 517 1 47.8% 28% 54.2% 18.2% 66.9% 58.5% 23.8% 52.6% 13.2%
Giolito, Lucas cws 537 1 48.6% 14.3% 60.4% 39% 59.1% 65.3% 29.4% 45.6% 31%
Eovaldi, Nathan bos 347 1 48.7% 11.8% 56.8% 25% 68% 63.8% 44.4% 50.8% 17.3%
Manoah, Alek tor 561 1 48.7% 14% 47.4% 25% 73% 57% 48.6% 54.3% 20.8%
Montgomery, Jordan stl 510 1 50.2% 22.7% 42.9% 26.3% 66.2% 77.5% 16.7% 52.5% 27%
Falter, Bailey phi 276 1 51.4% 20% 37.2% 13% 75.6% 75.7% 40.7% 59.5% 25%
Scherzer, Max nym 395 1 49.6% 20% 65.8% 5.9% 66.2% 66.3% 37.5% 56.3% 16.4%
Kershaw, Clayton la 381 1 49.9% 13.3% 43.5% 25% 69% 68.4% 28.6% 49.5% 54.3%
Lugo, Seth nym 267 1 48.3% 9.1% 52.4% 16.7% 57.7% 71.7% 35.3% 49% 28.9%
Baker, Bryan bal 261 1 51.3% 15.4% 55.2% 38.5% 51.5% 73.9% 37.5% 52.2% 37.8%
Rogers, Tyler sf 264 1 51.9% 66.7% 32.1% 11.1% 85.4% 46.7% 53.8% 65.9% 20%
Cobb, Alex sf 523 0 47.2% 7.1% 50% 30.8% 59.3% 60.3% 41.4% 41.8% 26.3%
Alexander, Tyler det 322 0 46.9% 9.1% 38.2% 17.6% 47.5% 81.7% 27.3% 45.5% 35.5%
Whitlock, Garrett bos 245 0 48.6% 0% 33.3% 21.4% 60.9% 69.6% 22.2% 55.3% 34.3%
Rodón, Carlos sf 591 0 47.9% 5.9% 61.3% 30.6% 57.9% 74.6% 16.3% 42.3% 15%
Quantrill, Cal cle 574 0 47% 21% 48.3% 37.9% 65.1% 73.3% 32% 43.5% 18%
Garrett, Braxton mia 278 0 48.6% 33.3% 60% 52.6% 41.5% 73.6% 18.8% 48.1% 31.3%
Gonsolin, Tony la 383 0 47.8% 7.4% 28.6% 21.4% 64.6% 78.4% 35.7% 58.9% 22.9%
Ray, Robbie sea 505 0 46.3% 25% 37.3% 9.8% 61.1% 67.9% 20% 50.6% 50%
Velasquez, Vince cws 262 0 46.6% 41.2% 45.8% 25% 72.5% 67.3% 20% 47.6% 16%
Gallen, Zac ari 618 0 46.1% 25.8% 45.1% 6.3% 78.6% 51.6% 52.2% 41.5% 13.6%
Hendricks, Kyle chc 283 0 47.3% 22.2% 66.7% 26.1% 69.2% 48.8% 48% 41.2% 26.5%
Syndergaard, Noah phi 425 0 48% 32.6% 46.9% 41.2% 60% 71.6% 24.1% 50.6% 20.8%
Houser, Adrian mil 423 0 48% 7.7% 32.5% 23.5% 57.4% 71.1% 34.3% 54.4% 24.5%
Carrasco, Carlos nym 423 0 48% 22.7% 46.8% 20% 48.9% 78.9% 33.3% 52.6% 30.4%
Gray, Josiah was 511 0 47.6% 18.4% 50% 18.2% 70.8% 66% 40.6% 41.5% 12.3%
Sampson, Adrian chc 335 0 46% 13.6% 52.3% 11.8% 75% 43.5% 42.3% 45.7% 32.4%
Anderson, Ian atl 349 0 45.8% 10% 45.7% 29.6% 65.9% 65.8% 41.4% 44.9% 18.4%
Hearn, Taylor tex 357 0 47.9% 26.1% 63.8% 14.3% 48.6% 74.6% 37.8% 45.2% 27.8%
Fedde, Erick was 554 0 46.6% 27.3% 60.4% 18.8% 61.2% 54.1% 25% 51.5% 10.3%
Smyly, Drew chc 303 0 44.6% 15% 63.9% 31.8% 56.1% 65.2% 27.3% 34.9% 11.8%
Ryan, Joe min 473 0 48.4% 31.5% 43.7% 22.6% 66.7% 59% 25% 63.1% 24.5%
Kopech, Michael cws 386 0 46.6% 30.6% 41.1% 15.4% 66% 64.6% 14.3% 55.1% 17.4%
Peralta, Freddy mil 275 0 48.7% 8% 53.6% 40% 64% 60% 41.2% 59.6% 14.3%
Suárez, Ranger phi 611 0 48.6% 8.3% 39.4% 17.6% 64.9% 75.3% 26.8% 52.2% 32.6%
Brubaker, JT pit 515 0 47.2% 22.4% 47.7% 29.6% 50% 58.9% 53.3% 61.8% 20.8%
Singer, Brady kc 538 0 46.5% 14.7% 55.8% 16.7% 48.1% 65.5% 45.5% 47.5% 26.4%
Feltner, Ryan col 370 0 46.5% 20% 56.1% 28.6% 64.1% 60.8% 25% 47.2% 19%
Montero, Rafael hou 305 0 48.5% 27.3% 50% 8.3% 56.9% 64.2% 42.4% 51.5% 23.8%
Thompson, Zach pit 425 0 47.1% 29.7% 48.6% 37.5% 58.8% 62.5% 21.1% 52.4% 24%
Crowe, Wil pit 261 0 47.1% 14.3% 40% 0% 46.3% 75% 60% 57.5% 15.8%
Otto, Glenn tex 424 0 48.6% 27.3% 54.3% 41.7% 63.1% 61.2% 50% 49.5% 18.6%
Winckowski, Josh bos 260 0 46.9% 21.7% 54.5% 50% 61.9% 68.6% 0% 34.8% 17.2%
Odorizzi, Jake atl 345 0 46.7% 20.6% 47.7% 42.4% 51.2% 64.8% 25% 40% 30.8%
Pivetta, Nick bos 607 0 47% 33.3% 60% 22.9% 63.2% 62% 25% 41.4% 19%
Severino, Luis nyy 360 0 47.8% 0% 42.3% 17.6% 60.8% 62.2% 50% 63.9% 27.7%
White, Mitch tor 297 0 49.2% 32.1% 47.8% 25% 59.2% 69.8% 25% 60% 11.5%
Mahle, Tyler min 481 0 47.2% 17.6% 41.7% 36.8% 66.2% 58.4% 57.7% 51.3% 20%
Watkins, Spenser bal 331 -1 45.6% 12.8% 36.5% 10% 71.6% 58.1% 38.5% 58.6% 21.4%
Crawford, Kutter bos 250 -1 42.8% 15% 69.2% 29.4% 63.9% 47.1% 15.4% 51.9% 14.3%
Brieske, Beau det 267 -1 42.7% 7.7% 14.3% 0% 59.6% 59.1% 26.1% 54.2% 22.9%
Pallante, Andre stl 402 -1 43.3% 24% 48.4% 9.1% 62.7% 62.9% 25% 39.2% 12.8%
Gore, MacKenzie sd 247 -1 44.9% 5.9% 36.4% 12% 56.6% 68.1% 21.1% 58.5% 41.7%
Flexen, Chris sea 404 -1 44.6% 24.4% 51.6% 28.9% 65% 64.3% 22.6% 45.5% 23.4%
Luzardo, Jesús mia 366 -1 47.3% 18.2% 47.4% 18.2% 55.6% 72.1% 31.1% 60.7% 19.4%
McClanahan, Shane tb 506 -1 46.6% 41.2% 49.3% 21.4% 63.8% 57.5% 32.8% 49.6% 22.2%
Cease, Dylan cws 534 -1 46.8% 18.2% 55.4% 22.2% 63.5% 63.8% 57.1% 48.1% 19.7%
Springs, Jeffrey tb 410 -1 45.1% 8.3% 40.3% 15.9% 54% 72.9% 31% 53.5% 31.8%
Urías, Julio la 506 -1 46.6% 23.8% 44.3% 13.7% 63.2% 70.8% 16.4% 55.4% 27.6%
Cessa, Luis cin 272 -1 44.1% 22.2% 46.2% 28.6% 62.5% 71.7% 35.7% 39.7% 18.8%
Voth, Austin bal 352 -1 43.8% 22.6% 56.1% 20% 63.4% 50% 50% 45.7% 15.4%
Akin, Keegan bal 256 -1 44.5% 16.7% 41.7% 30% 56.3% 55.8% 22.9% 58.1% 17.9%
Bassitt, Chris nym 626 -1 47.1% 23.3% 47.6% 33.3% 45.9% 62.7% 25% 61.1% 30.5%
Lauer, Eric mil 569 -1 46% 28.6% 49.3% 14.9% 57.9% 69.4% 19.4% 51.6% 33.3%
Thompson, Keegan chc 386 -1 43.8% 19% 47.4% 12.5% 63.8% 61.2% 40% 38.5% 18.6%
Wells, Tyler bal 327 -1 45% 20% 52% 20% 61.1% 57.1% 50% 53.3% 22%
Scott, Tanner mia 247 -1 46.2% 9.1% 50% 16.7% 63.5% 72% 26.2% 46.3% 28.6%
Wacha, Michael bos 395 -1 44.6% 25.7% 62.7% 40% 58.3% 57.8% 39.3% 27.5% 29.5%
Mikolas, Miles stl 705 -1 45.4% 15% 59.6% 45.5% 67.1% 60% 16.7% 35% 17.9%
Plesac, Zach cle 390 -1 45.1% 15% 52.4% 38.1% 53.3% 69.6% 30.8% 36.7% 29.6%
Gomber, Austin col 421 -1 45.1% 35% 45.2% 34.4% 62.3% 74.6% 19.4% 38.1% 32%
Kirby, George sea 456 -1 44.5% 19% 54.1% 21.9% 62.3% 62.7% 23.1% 40.7% 16.9%
Suarez, José ana 350 -1 42.9% 9.1% 35.9% 12.1% 55.4% 67.2% 21.3% 47.3% 25%
Wheeler, Zack phi 545 -1 46.8% 16.7% 38.3% 23.3% 63.6% 57.9% 56.3% 56.5% 18.6%
Urquidy, José hou 499 -1 46.5% 30% 47.5% 31.6% 75% 59.4% 83.3% 45.9% 21.4%
Wood, Alex sf 460 -1 45.7% 2.9% 51.2% 19.2% 59.2% 66.7% 16.7% 53.3% 26.1%
Walker, Taijuan nym 483 -1 46.8% 30% 51.6% 27.3% 53% 65.8% 37.5% 47.7% 20.6%
Wilson, Bryse pit 394 -1 44.7% 26.5% 44.7% 6.7% 61.5% 64.3% 40% 44.3% 20%
Ashby, Aaron mil 374 -1 46.8% 0% 51.9% 22.9% 60% 66.7% 20.6% 51.2% 26.1%
Eflin, Zach phi 320 -1 46.9% 6.3% 23.8% 0% 76.4% 59.1% 45.8% 48.8% 24.5%
Stripling, Ross tor 401 -1 44.4% 20.5% 61.7% 10% 63.2% 60.6% 26.9% 44.3% 8.3%
Junis, Jakob sf 372 -1 45.4% 8.1% 65.6% 0% 51.8% 65.5% 29.2% 50% 27.3%
Corbin, Patrick was 537 -1 45.4% 34.5% 47.9% 16% 60% 63.2% 23.8% 43.6% 21.2%
Yarbrough, Ryan tb 257 -1 44.7% 6.7% 48.8% 21.7% 45.3% 70.6% 11.8% 54.3% 18.2%
Lynn, Lance cws 342 -1 45% 29% 49.1% 12.5% 82.3% 40.8% 22.2% 46% 22.2%
Ureña, José col 307 -1 45.6% 36.4% 61.5% 10% 67.3% 57.4% 39.3% 38.7% 17.5%
Diekman, Jake cws 248 -1 44.4% 20% 55.2% 16.7% 42.4% 65.9% 28.3% 54.8% 25%
Gibson, Kyle phi 552 -1 46% 25% 41.7% 40% 61.2% 62% 25.9% 49.1% 20%
Gilbert, Logan sea 561 -1 44.9% 22.8% 46.5% 32% 63.6% 61% 23.1% 37.8% 22%
Kimbrel, Craig la 249 -1 44.2% 11.8% 33.3% 0% 76.2% 52.8% 66.7% 64.7% 22%
Peterson, David nym 374 -1 45.7% 0% 55.4% 31.7% 54.5% 65.9% 24% 40.8% 26.1%
Lodolo, Nick cin 354 -1 43.8% 20% 64.8% 31.3% 44.6% 73% 9.1% 33.9% 0%
Zimmermann, Bruce bal 244 -2 39.3% 22.2% 36.6% 4.3% 62.2% 59.6% 14.3% 44.4% 35.7%
Snell, Blake sd 510 -2 45.5% 17.9% 45% 38.6% 54.7% 67.3% 26.8% 37.3% 35.9%
Manaea, Sean sd 496 -2 43.3% 5.9% 35.1% 25.4% 35.2% 80.2% 7.5% 44% 29.4%
Clevinger, Mike sd 397 -2 44.3% 21.1% 43.1% 38.1% 57.3% 60.2% 15.8% 46.3% 11.6%
Sandoval, Patrick ana 476 -2 42.4% 12% 45.7% 16.7% 63.5% 48.3% 21.7% 56.5% 22.2%
Rodriguez, Eduardo det 323 -2 43.7% 16.7% 28.6% 7.1% 63.6% 64.8% 35.6% 38.6% 21.7%
Adon, Joan was 269 -2 39.8% 4.3% 43.8% 50% 73.3% 47.5% 41.7% 50% 6.7%
Wright, Kyle atl 522 -2 44.1% 17.5% 45.6% 23.1% 60.3% 56.1% 35% 50.5% 12.3%
Hutchison, Drew det 342 -2 43.6% 18.5% 42.5% 20% 79.7% 50% 29.4% 40.6% 20.5%
Detmers, Reid ana 406 -2 43.3% 23.1% 48.9% 13.1% 61% 60.4% 26.3% 50% 30%
Smith, Caleb ari 248 -2 40.7% 14.8% 57.6% 14.8% 55.9% 60% 12.5% 36.8% 60%
Montas, Frankie nyy 421 -2 43.7% 11.1% 35.9% 16.7% 50.5% 71.2% 38.5% 43% 32.8%
McKenzie, Triston cle 520 -2 43.1% 26.8% 39.5% 3.6% 75.3% 62.2% 20.7% 41.1% 20.8%
Alcantara, Sandy mia 650 -2 45.5% 16% 46.6% 31.3% 62.6% 48.6% 44.4% 54.7% 18%
Rasmussen, Drew tb 398 -2 43.5% 21.4% 37.7% 7.7% 62.1% 63.5% 52.2% 48.1% 9.1%
Senzatela, Antonio col 320 -2 42.2% 25% 51.7% 15.4% 61.5% 36.2% 47.6% 49.1% 13.2%
Woodruff, Brandon mil 522 -2 45.2% 17.2% 35.6% 9.1% 62.4% 60.6% 27.3% 54.7% 27.5%
Strider, Spencer atl 428 -2 42.8% 20% 36.7% 22.2% 64.1% 51.2% 40% 44.8% 23.1%
Heaney, Andrew la 285 -2 42.8% 21.7% 32.6% 5.3% 48.1% 68.6% 20% 65.3% 33.3%
Ashcraft, Graham cin 341 -2 42.2% 10.8% 41.3% 25% 58.6% 71.4% 45% 46.6% 10%
Márquez, Germán col 544 -2 43.2% 18.2% 53.5% 50% 56.5% 53.9% 21.6% 53.7% 18.5%
Coleman, Dylan kc 247 -2 40.5% 13.3% 58.6% 11.1% 69% 31.4% 28.6% 35.3% 14.8%
Lorenzen, Michael ana 304 -2 41.8% 15.2% 37.1% 30% 65.4% 46.8% 33.3% 56.8% 7.9%
Kremer, Dean bal 371 -3 41% 13.5% 42.2% 27.3% 62.1% 51.4% 66.7% 48% 13.1%
Archer, Chris min 373 -3 41% 15.8% 42.4% 29.6% 70.9% 54.2% 35% 36.1% 23.4%
Javier, Cristian hou 496 -3 41.9% 20.9% 51.9% 28.6% 57.1% 55.8% 31.8% 40.7% 20%
Heasley, Jonathan kc 417 -3 40.5% 7.7% 38.8% 18.8% 55.2% 60.9% 27.6% 40.9% 11.1%
Keller, Mitch pit 576 -3 42.2% 18.6% 39% 16.7% 61.5% 55.7% 40% 50.8% 9.4%
Steele, Justin chc 423 -4 38.1% 30% 56.2% 18% 53.8% 51.6% 9.3% 36.2% 4.5%
Bubic, Kris kc 492 -4 39.8% 16.7% 43.8% 14.8% 60.9% 61.1% 16.3% 37.5% 23.1%
Lynch IV, Daniel kc 433 -4 39% 10% 43.3% 10.5% 57% 59.8% 11.9% 37.3% 23.3%
Rogers, Trevor mia 415 -4 40.7% 15.4% 32.6% 3.8% 58.3% 43.3% 18.2% 52.5% 34.8%
Bradish, Kyle bal 414 -4 40.1% 13% 40.5% 37.5% 63.9% 53.8% 32% 47.1% 15.6%
Valdez, Framber hou 730 -4 43.7% 37.9% 50.5% 14.9% 68.5% 36.3% 22.8% 47.9% 12.5%
Keller, Brad kc 437 -4 39.6% 18% 53.7% 5.9% 58.6% 53.8% 14.3% 39.2% 18.2%
Darvish, Yu sd 687 -4 44.5% 12.8% 44.6% 29.4% 59.7% 62.4% 30.6% 40.9% 24.4%
Hudson, Dakota stl 509 -4 39.7% 16.7% 50% 35.7% 40% 74.2% 12.5% 44.6% 18.8%
Greene, Hunter cin 433 -4 39.3% 16.7% 43.1% 10.5% 60% 52.2% 48.1% 42.6% 17.3%
Kikuchi, Yusei tor 361 -5 35.5% 0% 32.1% 0% 43.3% 47.5% 25.5% 50.6% 25%